Contemplating the vastness of the cosmos & is everything beyond reach?

Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? --Oddball

Your opinion is uncalled for inasmuch as you see fit to call me names. Try using some polite method of disagreeing with whatever I say. Better yet, don't bother to read what I respond to. That applies to you as well, Oy.
 

I must admit I'm interested in the possibilities of quantum entanglement. Apparently two quantum items once entangled will mimic each other's state instantaneously, no matter how far apart they both are. As the modern world is run on binary maths ('0' and '1') this could mean instant digital communications across vast distances in space, and would allow for the possibility of remote controlled spacecraft and vehicles just about anywhere.

If we could deconstruct matter, send it through a wormhole, and reconstruct matter on the other side, we could visit other galaxies, with less fuss than getting through airport security. But even a stargate requires an immense amount of electrical energy more than a standard rocket would require using solid fuels, so while it would be doable, the cost might be prohibitive. OK, my imagination might be getting ahead of myself.
 

I saw somewhere a radical plan for a 36 mile long spacecraft design that would be for multi-generational travel. Many generations would live and die on the spaceship before it reaches a destination, perhaps a thousand years from now. It would be like a traveling city with a thousand or so inhabitants. People would go to work, go to the park, go out dining and dancing, etc..., and life would continue as normal as possible, except your city is hurtling through space. Good luck to the budget committee getting that expenditure through.

I read a science fiction novel some years ago about a spacecraft like that that took several hundred years to reach their destination. And when they got there there were people that had left after them already there waiting on them because in the interim technology had advanced to the point where much faster travel was possible.

"What took you guys so long? It was only a three hour flight for us." :ROFLMAO:
 
There you go. Science evolves.

Speaking of which, up until my sophomore year in high school, I was taught there were 2 kingdoms of life, plant and animal. It all made sense. Just three years later in college there were 5 kingdoms of life. No one talked about the change had recently occurred, so I didn't really know what they were talking about. Life was plant or animal, and that was it! It took me years to adjust. Although the only thing that changed was how they classified living things. But this happened because our knowledge base increased.

In early elementary school a new theory about our planet had been proposed. The idea that continents drifted, broke apart, and hooked up with others to form new land masses. I remember my teacher talking about this and she gave some examples that supported the theory. She also told us about the objections to the theory. The theory of continental drift had been around before then, but mostly scorned, even by Einstein, I believe. It was somewhere around the time I graduated from college when scientists finally came into agreement that plate tectonics was a fact, and with aid of GPS could actually be detected and measured.

A degree of skepticism is always in order, but should be tempered by the evidence that supports a theory.
 
There you go. Science evolves.

Speaking of which, up until my sophomore year in high school, I was taught there were 2 kingdoms of life, plant and animal. It all made sense. Just three years later in college there were 5 kingdoms of life. No one talked about the change had recently occurred, so I didn't really know what they were talking about. Life was plant or animal, and that was it! It took me years to adjust. Although the only thing that changed was how they classified living things. But this happened because our knowledge base increased.

In early elementary school a new theory about our planet had been proposed. The idea that continents drifted, broke apart, and hooked up with others to form new land masses. I remember my teacher talking about this and she gave some examples that supported the theory. She also told us about the objections to the theory. The theory of continental drift had been around before then, but mostly scorned, even by Einstein, I believe. It was somewhere around the time I graduated from college when scientists finally came into agreement that plate tectonics was a fact, and with aid of GPS could actually be detected and measured.

A degree of skepticism is always in order, but should be tempered by the evidence that supports a theory.
In college, I took a geology course enticingly called "Space Exploration". It dealt with distinguishing meteor formed craters versus volcanic craters. Meteor formed craters featured a rock surge in the center that left a small mountain in the center.

Volcanic activity blows the lid off a mountain and lava flows that redefine landscapes. The Mount St Helens eruption happened at that time and the professor said they were completely surprised since geologist did not detect any subterranean activity just a few years before.
What was interesting about Mt St Helens was that the surrounding plant life devastated by lava flows rebounded fairly quickly.

I like tectonic plate theory because it explains fault lines and earthquakes in the vicinity.

This video about Pluto is very interesting. A lot of interesting theories about its formation andcthe formation of the solar system.

Dont miss two other videos I posted about Space Exploration...

Who Knew? Some Fun Facts

Who Knew? Some Fun Facts
 
Last edited:
If we could deconstruct matter, send it through a wormhole, and reconstruct matter on the other side, we could visit other galaxies, with less fuss than getting through airport security. But even a stargate requires an immense amount of electrical energy more than a standard rocket would require using solid fuels, so while it would be doable, the cost might be prohibitive. OK, my imagination might be getting ahead of myself.

Alien life forms would need some kind of technolgy like that to be coming here. Otherwise they would need to be traveling at many thousands of times the speed of light just to get around our own galaxy that is 100,000 light years across.
 
Stated as a fact but is not a fact.

Well, it's not like I know the date and time. But the consensus seems to be that Earth will be uninhabitable in a billion years due to our sun burning off our oceans. In 4 billion years, the sun will expand and burn our planet to nothingness.

I do consider the eventual end of planet earth is a fact. If for nothing else, because our sun is busy doing sun things.

I suspect I'll be dead when all this happens.
 


Back
Top