Of course they will... I mean if EVERYONE had an assault weapon in that concert hall..........................................................................
May I finish your above sentence ?.......then there wouldn't have been a hostage situation.
I'd be willing to bet that many of those inside would agree with......"It's much better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it."
Are you kidding me? There would have been a circular firing squad and many more would have been killed.. Can you imagine everyone firing an assault weapon and not having a clue who they were supposed to shoot.. other than someone shooting a gun...
May I finish your above sentence ?.......then there wouldn't have been a hostage situation.
I'd be willing to bet that many of those inside would agree with......"It's much better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it."
Several years ago I saw an experiment on this same kind of scenario. They took volunteers and put them in a classroom setting, giving them concealed weapons, then measured their ability to 1) get to the weapons in a timely manner, and 2) determine who to shoot. If I recall correctly, the volunteers shot many more of the innocent bystanders than they did the perpetrators in this imaginary setting, if they didn't get "killed" themselves because of hesitation and the time it took to get a weapon out. Have to agree with you here QS, if others had guns in that concert hall, more would have died, though that's hard to fathom right now. And this plays right into the column I posted earlier in this thread. How does an act of terrorism suddenly become a vehicle for advocating in favor of MORE GUNS! It's insanity.Sure you do... Perhaps you can't imagine the scene.. but I can. A dark concert hall.. Hundreds of people watching the show..and suddenly shots are fired.. People start screaming and running and not sure what they are screaming about or running from... NOW if you were there could YOU have in a split second determined what was going on and where and who you should direct your gun at? If you think you could you are fooling yourself. NOW add 15 or 20 more equally confused "good guys" and exactly how do you think that will pan out? These things are NOT Hollywood movies Ike.. There would have been just as many if not more deaths only many deaths would have been the result of "friendly fire". My guess is that as you shot your weapon at the bad guys... some "Good guy" would have taken you out...
And I would bet they wouldn't. Europeans don't have that stupid cowboy attitude where they are packing a weapon everywhere they go.
I have shared other columns by Frank Bruni of the NY Times. Here is today's, covering the exploitation/politicizing of the Paris attacks. Makes me sick. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/14/opinion/the-exploitation-of-paris.html?ref=opinion
Annie, Canadians don't subscribe to the QuickDraw mentality either.
And the Americans do not either. Twisted logic in too many minds.
Several years ago I saw an experiment on this same kind of scenario. They took volunteers and put them in a classroom setting, giving them concealed weapons, then measured their ability to 1) get to the weapons in a timely manner, and 2) determine who to shoot. If I recall correctly, the volunteers shot many more of the innocent bystanders than they did the perpetrators in this imaginary setting, if they didn't get "killed" themselves because of hesitation and the time it took to get a weapon out. Have to agree with you here QS, if others had guns in that concert hall, more would have died, though that's hard to fathom right now. And this plays right into the column I posted earlier in this thread. How does an act of terrorism suddenly become a vehicle for advocating in favor of MORE GUNS! It's insanity.
Makes me sick as well.
Definitely a full blown liberal lefty that just hates any other type of political thinking. He has inadvertently listed many of the problems of the liberal far left thinkers. Yes they do need to be discussed and made aware of to the general public. We don't carry guns everywhere, questions need to be asked and not belittled by believers of some of these lies and distortions. Clean air? Temps rising? Yes we all work for clean air but we also need to make sure the people can still travel, live in comfort with heat and cooling, have jobs, and on and on. Temperature rising about 1 degree Celsious over 15 or so years. My, that could be in the accuracy of the instrumentation around the world. It could be in the interpretations around the world. That could be just another normal rise in the temperature that happens in the normal temperature cycles of the world. Just before the heat rising started we were in a cooling fear time as it was threatened that we were heading into colder weather. Most of this nonsense is political rather than actual.
Of course they do. Many, not all. Look at all the people shopping at Walmart with their weapons over their shoulders.
You have missed the entire point of the article.
ANd that would be unusual HOW? HAHAHAHAHAHA
You have missed the entire point of the article.
You have missed the entire point of the article.