Princess Diana

gallery-1453244376-012.jpg
 
I'm a guy and I don't understand the adoration of Diana, but my girlfriend did. We toured London & Paris. The site that thrilled her the most was in Paris, where a Statue of Liberty's Torch was. And directly beneath it was was the under ground roadway and the exact W1siZiIsInVwbG9hZHMvcGxhY2VfaW1hZ2VzLzJhM2VlMDQwY2M2MWUwNGM4ZV82NDBweC1TY3VscHR1cmVfcG9udF9kZV9s.jpgpillar, which Diana crashed into. There were flowers all over. People just stared at that spot. I don't get it, but to others, she was their Princess. When we go back home, that's all my girlfriend talked about. That was all her friends wanted talk about, too.
 
Diana was only 19 when she married and was betrayed by her cheating husband Charles and Camilla Bowles.
I feel Diana's problems fall squarely on those two. I have no admiration for either of them.
The public loved Diana and sympathized for the emotional pain those two put her through.
 
Diana brought some much needed fresh genes to the Royal Family. Charles naively thought he could continue the tradition of his royal ancestors. To have both wives and mistresses were common place.
 
Some of our papers over here have been dishing the dirt,
mainly on Charles I think, I haven't read any of it, but the
headlines suggest so.

I believe that she should have been left alone, both during
her life and after she died.

Mike.
 
A promiscuous bimbo who is no sort of to;e model. She never so much as blinked without calculating what was in it for Diana.

She's not the first long legged blonde to have trapped a naive and inexperienced young man into too early matrimony.

Like her predecessor Wallis Simpson she brought the monarchy to its knees.
 
Laurie said:
A promiscuous bimbo who is no sort of to;e model. She never so much as blinked without calculating what was in it for Diana.

She's not the first long legged blonde to have trapped a naive and inexperienced young man into too early matrimony.

Like her predecessor Wallis Simpson she brought the monarchy to its knees.
Click to expand...

IDK. I honestly believe she was not a conniving woman like Wallis Simpson who was a divorcee when she enticed Edward into marriage. I can't compare those two.
 
She will always be the beautiful Princess Di to me. She was larger than life and I can hardly believe she left us so soon. The world is a better place for her having been here.
 
Laurie said:
A promiscuous bimbo who is no sort of to;e model. She never so much as blinked without calculating what was in it for Diana.

She's not the first long legged blonde to have trapped a naive and inexperienced young man into too early matrimony.

Like her predecessor Wallis Simpson she brought the monarchy to its knees.
Click to expand...
I agree, she had her affairs too. Nobody says anything about them.
 
As a side note - One of the Golden Rules of common decency is that we do not speak ill of the departed, since they are not here to defend themselves. Folks who violate that rule expose their own lack of decency, not that of the departed one.

Have a great day.
 
Hoot N Annie said:
As a side note - One of the Golden Rules of common decency is that we do not speak ill of the departed, since they are not here to defend themselves. Folks who violate that rule expose their own lack of decency, not that of the departed one.

Have a great day.
Click to expand...
Thank you Terry, I agree. I hope you have a wonderful day too!:sentimental:
 
What ! comparing Diana to the scheming Wallis, just not so. Diana did not "trap" Charles,( who was pressured into getting married by his domineering father Price Philip). Diana was what was needed a 19 year old virgin, whom Charles used as a "brood mare" to produce an heir or two. And after the heartbreak of learning of his dalliances, of course who wouldn't seek solace elsewhere.
 
Meringue said:
What ! comparing Diana to the scheming Wallis, just not so. Diana did not "trap" Charles,( who was pressured into getting married by his domineering father Price Philip). Diana was what was needed a 19 year old virgin, whom Charles used as a "brood mare" to produce an heir or two. And after the heartbreak of learning of his dalliances, of course who wouldn't seek solace elsewhere.
Click to expand...

I have always understood that it was the interfering Queen mother and Diana's grandmother that colluded together to get them together, because of Charles age at that time the Queen Mother was worried he wouldn't be producing any heirs to the throne.

Anyone with any sense should have known on the day the engagement was announced when Charles was asked if he was in love, his reply was......whatever love is......that it wouldn't last.

Camilla was always Charles true love even before Diana came on the scene.
 
Meringue said:
What ! comparing Diana to the scheming Wallis, just not so. Diana did not "trap" Charles,( who was pressured into getting married by his domineering father Price Philip). Diana was what was needed a 19 year old virgin, whom Charles used as a "brood mare" to produce an heir or two. And after the heartbreak of learning of his dalliances, of course who wouldn't seek solace elsewhere.
Click to expand...

Exactly! Camilla was in the picture from day 1 of Di's relationship with Charles. I've watched lots of documentaries on this, at least 20 or so, and it is common knowledge that when he married Diana he was in love with Camilla. He even wore cuff links from her on his honeymoon with Diana. Now, who wouldn't be looking for love elsewhere? How humiliating, and Di knew about her even as she walked down the aisle. I don't know how anyone can justify that.
 
One of the Golden Rules of common decency is that we do not speak ill of the departed, since they are not here to defend themselves.




What utter and arrant nonsense.

Should we then to assume that Hitler was a world philanthropist with a disturbed childhood, or that Capone should be forgiven all because he loved his mother?


Wrong is wrong, and your death doesn't make it right..
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top