Did anyone watch the program last night? There were a couple of new witnesses that changed some of the story. Wagner had said that Wood was in their room alone and after a while Wagner said he realized she wasn't on the boat. He had said that the dingy was partly unsecured and was banging on the side of the boat which likely disturbed Natalie and so she likely went out there to tie it back up, and then probably tripped on the stairs, got hit on the head, fell in the water and drowned. And he says he should have been there for her. With the new witnesses (which the detective said were credible) that story doesn't hold up because they saw TWO figures outside the boat that night. Wagner didn't allow for help for quite a long time to be called because he said he thought that she had gone onshore to get away from the boat.
The other new witness was docked nearby and could hear horrible fighting. The captain of Wagner's boat said that the argument in the room was very loud and he could hear banging on the walls so that it really sounded something like something really violent going on. The detective said that the autopsy showed that Natalie had injuries on her body similar to someone having been assaulted.
As far as Christopher Walken is concerned, his main contribution to what happened was that Natalie was paying a lot of attention to him and Wagner became more and more ragingly jealous. There was a fight in the living area and Wagner smashed a champagne bottle on the table with glass all over the floor. He told the detectives that it was a result of choppy waters.
There's lots more to this story (and Lani Woods, Natalie's younger sister) was interviewed. She did say that at least once, Natalie had to run to a neighbor because she felt her life was threatened (by Wagner). And she said that Natalie told her how frightened she was of Wagner (of course, this is hearsay). They got divorced and then later got remarried, and were married until that day on the boat.
Because of the time that has passed since the event, the statute of limitations has run out for all except for murder. And the detective said that they could not charge anyone for the murder of Natalie because there was no evidence as to how Natalie got into the water. And the question was if someone could have saved her, but didn't, wouldn't that be a crime? And the answer was that, no, nothing in the law obligates anyone to save someone in trouble.
So, basically, it appears that nothing really relevant has changed as far as being able to do anything about this possible murder.
The other new witness was docked nearby and could hear horrible fighting. The captain of Wagner's boat said that the argument in the room was very loud and he could hear banging on the walls so that it really sounded something like something really violent going on. The detective said that the autopsy showed that Natalie had injuries on her body similar to someone having been assaulted.
As far as Christopher Walken is concerned, his main contribution to what happened was that Natalie was paying a lot of attention to him and Wagner became more and more ragingly jealous. There was a fight in the living area and Wagner smashed a champagne bottle on the table with glass all over the floor. He told the detectives that it was a result of choppy waters.
There's lots more to this story (and Lani Woods, Natalie's younger sister) was interviewed. She did say that at least once, Natalie had to run to a neighbor because she felt her life was threatened (by Wagner). And she said that Natalie told her how frightened she was of Wagner (of course, this is hearsay). They got divorced and then later got remarried, and were married until that day on the boat.
Because of the time that has passed since the event, the statute of limitations has run out for all except for murder. And the detective said that they could not charge anyone for the murder of Natalie because there was no evidence as to how Natalie got into the water. And the question was if someone could have saved her, but didn't, wouldn't that be a crime? And the answer was that, no, nothing in the law obligates anyone to save someone in trouble.
So, basically, it appears that nothing really relevant has changed as far as being able to do anything about this possible murder.