Diwundrin
Well-known Member
- Location
- Nth Coast NSW Australia
We are still recovering from the news yesterday that a father bashed his 11 year old son to death with a cricket bat at a school practice match. He did it full view of the other schoolkid players and parents and teachers and the child's mother. He did it before anyone could reach them to stop him.
He was a known nut case, and under an 'apprehended violence order' to stay away from the family home, but allowed access to see the son he professed to be the only thing he cared about in life in public, safe circumstances. Like a school cricket practice session.
His son asked his mother was it okay if he spent a few more minutes with Dad after practice as he didn't see him very often and he wanted more time with him because he felt sorry for him. So he walked back to his father on the edge of the field and to his death from the man he wanted to comfort in his loneliness.
One second a loving Dad, the next a homicidal maniac who'd brutally murdered his son and was turning on the crowd with a knife he'd bought along as backup for the bat.
No trial necessary. A cop placed one into his chest when pepper spray and brute force couldn't control him. A righteous shooting if ever there was one. It's emerging he planned the whole thing and 'death by cop' was the object of the exercise but why take his son??
We really need to rethink our mental health legislation.
Please don't point out that if the schoolboys and parents who witnessed this had all opened up with .38s they could have saved this boy.
They wouldn't have. It all happened too fast and people couldn't comprehend what they were seeing to react with more than shocked paralysis for too many seconds to save him.
We have our share of horrendous crimes, we just treat them a tad too 'humanely' imo.
Why wasn't this psycho locked up? Who judged that he should be free to live in society and murder a child as part of his 'rights' to liberty?? How could someone live with having made that call?
http://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/a/2144...ather-greg-who-had-history-of-mental-illness/
This is a sad, sad story on so many levels.
He was a known nut case, and under an 'apprehended violence order' to stay away from the family home, but allowed access to see the son he professed to be the only thing he cared about in life in public, safe circumstances. Like a school cricket practice session.
His son asked his mother was it okay if he spent a few more minutes with Dad after practice as he didn't see him very often and he wanted more time with him because he felt sorry for him. So he walked back to his father on the edge of the field and to his death from the man he wanted to comfort in his loneliness.
One second a loving Dad, the next a homicidal maniac who'd brutally murdered his son and was turning on the crowd with a knife he'd bought along as backup for the bat.
No trial necessary. A cop placed one into his chest when pepper spray and brute force couldn't control him. A righteous shooting if ever there was one. It's emerging he planned the whole thing and 'death by cop' was the object of the exercise but why take his son??
We really need to rethink our mental health legislation.
Please don't point out that if the schoolboys and parents who witnessed this had all opened up with .38s they could have saved this boy.
They wouldn't have. It all happened too fast and people couldn't comprehend what they were seeing to react with more than shocked paralysis for too many seconds to save him.
We have our share of horrendous crimes, we just treat them a tad too 'humanely' imo.
Why wasn't this psycho locked up? Who judged that he should be free to live in society and murder a child as part of his 'rights' to liberty?? How could someone live with having made that call?
http://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/a/2144...ather-greg-who-had-history-of-mental-illness/
This is a sad, sad story on so many levels.