Are the Covid vaccines experimental?experimental drug
Then why is there NO product liability for any of the covid 19 vaccines? The question no one wants to answer. Because there is no product liability on an experimental drug. The FDA has admitted they don't know what will happen to children if they vaccinate them. So they are going to vaccinate them first and learn afterwards. If they those were my kids or grandkids I'd be furious. They are human guinea pigs. Which makes me think this is not about public health. It's something else entirely.Are the Covid vaccines experimental?
They have been used hundred of millions of times now.
I could not find a technical definition of what an experimental drug is, but there are lots of reliable people who say that the Covid vaccines are no longer experimental, see for example: https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...y-have-not-skipped-trial-stages-idUSL1N2M70MW
Most all vaccines and drug treatments change and are not fully understood. It just goes with the nature of medicine.
there are lots of reliable people who say that the Covid vaccines are no longer experimental, see for example: [reuters]
There is some, but it is greatly limited by law, the PREP Act and subsequent declarations ( https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/prepact/Pages/default.aspx ). This means the government considers Covid to be a public emergency, not that the vaccines are experimental. It is intended to prevent the slow of something like vaccination for reasons of legal liability concern.why is there NO product liability for any of the covid 19 vaccines?
I cannot find evidence of this. To the contrary it appears to me the FDA has reviewed available testing and data and concluded the vaccines are safe. See for example https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pre...llow-science-covid-19-vaccines-young-children . If what you mean is that some uncertainty remains, of course it does. As it does with all medical treatment.The FDA has admitted they don't know what will happen to children if they vaccinate them.
Yes and no, they have already learned quite a lot, however as with adults more will be learned by good epidemiological studies as we go along. Same is true of all medical treatments, this one is just newer than most.So they are going to vaccinate them first and learn afterwards.
It is "morally wrong" to not try to save the life of your child!!. The world is trying to save the children of tomorrow, not you chic so rien à discuter!I don't think an experimental drug should be used on children, period. For what? To save old people like me? It's morally wrong.
It is "morally wrong" to not try to save the life of your child!!
Well, that sounds scary....I'm glad I don't have children.My daughter who is a pharmacist is torn about it. Mainly because of the storage and everyone being extra sure that the right dose is given. She is going to insist a parent stay with the child for their shot. She had trouble with a mother who wanted to leave her crying 12 year old alone for his shot. She got mad at my daughter for insisting she stay. So they are having sessions to be sure where everything is stored so there are no mix ups in the dosages.
Lord give me patienceI completely agree, which is why a child's parents should be making that decision, not the ignorant butchers who want to continue poisoning the children with dangerous drugs and concoctions of who knows what else.
@bowmore, your personal attack and political conspiracy nonsense have no bearing on the extremely important issue that children have been and continue to be under constant attack and abuse by ignorant profit seeking butchers who don't care in the least what happens to them, which is why parents should be making that decision, not strangers who are poisoning the children for their personal profits. <--
But it's financially wonderful.I don't think an experimental drug should be used on children, period. For what? To save old people like me? It's morally wrong.
Only for big pharma @win231But it's financially wonderful.