Yes, that is the definition given for that phase, but it's still a filler phrase, and, by and large, a superfluous one lol!!It means "in general". It means not entirely, but looked at on the whole.
It's shorter than "for the most part"... now there's a positive!Yes, that is the definition given for that phase, but it's still a filler phrase, and, by and large, a superfluous one lol!!,
Well, what if you wanted to comment on some situation, but don't want to say it's completely absurd or useless? Or what if you wanted to comment about an organization (say, for corruption) but don't mean to say everybody in it is corrupt?Yes, that is the definition given for that phase, but it's still a filler phrase, and, by and large, a superfluous one lol!!
In that case, wouldn't "by and small" be more appropriate? LOL!Well, what if you wanted to comment on some situation, but don't want to say it's completely absurd or useless? Or what if you wanted to comment about an organization (say, for corruption) but don't mean to say everybody in it is corrupt?
Here's one that really annoys me..."by and large." The corporation, by and large, is corrupt." Why not just write "The corporation is corrupt"? LOL grrrr!!!I never heard "by and large" until recent years, now I hear it far too much, besides, what does it even mean LOL!
I know the meaning thank you, I wrote it because it's a phrase that annoys me lol!For the most part.
Hey wait! That's not Maynard it's Gilligan lol!!Remember Maynard G. Krebs?
View attachment 390226
He was like the first dude I knew of that put the "like" out there in the common vernacular.
You beat me to it, @Rindee ... that's exactly what I was going to say.Hey wait! That's not Maynard it's Gilligan lol!!
Better, "generally" or, "overall"It's shorter than "for the most part"... now there's a positive!![]()