Another Dig Into The Origins Of Covid

JonDouglas said:
Neither I nor anyone in my office could find any mention of politics or political figures in the OP. Perhaps you could help educate us and point them out.
Click to expand...
Well O.K., I'll highlight(in bold) your own words that show you were conscious of the political overtones.
JonDouglas said:
Investigative reporter of some note and independence, Sharyl Attkinsson has dug into the origins of covid-19 and put together a video presented HERE, noting that this site disallowed embedding the video.

You can assume the issues Attkinsson investigates are often quite controversial. All I can say is that it will take time for the fog over all this to lift. Until then, it is best to be aware, learn as much as we can, ask questions and avoid carte-blanch answers.

Who will be the first to call this post promoting a conspiracy as opposed to simply posting somebody's investigative report?
Click to expand...

Pretty obvious, even to the untrained eye.

About Sharyl Attkinsson:

Sharyl Attkisson took a stand on hydroxychloroquine: The anti-malarial drug, which President Trump had touted as a treatment for covid-19, had been unfairly maligned by “the left-leaning press,” she suggested. The scientific community’s uncertainty about it? Just a politicized debate, she argued.

As for reports of safety concerns raised by the Food and Drug Administration and other experts, Attkisson interviewed a Detroit cardiologist who dismissed them as “fake news” and “fake science.”
When she interviewed Trump himself a week later, he told her that he’d seen “tremendous reports” and “incredible studies” about its effectiveness. Attkisson didn’t ask for details nor raise any questions about the fatal heart arrhythmias that have been associated with its use. Link
Click to expand...

Attkinsson sure seems to be a willing outlet for sensational, unfounded "reporting". Reminds me of Geraldo Rivera's style.

About the video:
Attkinsson's video attempts to link Dr. Fauci,Shi Zhengli, Ralph Baric,the NIH, Peter Daszak as being culpable for Covid 19.
The video quotes "un-named" sources many times, making many unfounded allegations, talking about "many" scientists that are afraid to speak out, etc. Pretty slick tactic for smearing individuals, creating false impressions, all the while carefully avoiding any direct comment that may cause legal repercussions.
Nicely done!
 

Nathan said:
Well O.K., I'll highlight(in bold) your own words that show you were conscious of the political overtones.


Pretty obvious, even to the untrained eye.

About Sharyl Attkinsson:



Attkinsson sure seems to be a willing outlet for sensational, unfounded "reporting". Reminds me of Geraldo Rivera's style.

About the video:
Attkinsson's video attempts to link Dr. Fauci,Shi Zhengli, Ralph Baric,the NIH, Peter Daszak as being culpable for Covid 19.
The video quotes "un-named" sources many times, making many unfounded allegations, talking about "many" scientists that are afraid to speak out, etc. Pretty slick tactic for smearing individuals, creating false impressions, all the while carefully avoiding any direct comment that may cause legal repercussions.
Nicely done!
Click to expand...
Are you stalking? What part of "I don't care about Attkinsson" are you having trouble with? Go read the MIT article, which is in the same plane and see if you can drudge up some political deflection there. It might be amusing, if not useful. We already know you want to impugn Attkinson's reputation. Give it a rest. She isn't the only one out there chasing this.
 
Returning to the issue of the story, there is the NPR article entitled Theory That Covid Came From A Chinese Lab Takes On New Life.
As you read this, you might wonder what the current administration could possibly have in common with Attkinsson. A clue to the answer might be be:

For its part, the Biden administration joined 13 other governments to criticize the WHO report and call for more openness from China on Tuesday​
 
JonDouglas said:
Oh, evil intent is alive and well, if not in the minds of the naive. We all know that the major powers are working both on bio-weapons and countermeasures, just as they worked on nuclear weapons and countermeasures (been there, done that). As for the sources of and motives for Covid-19, smart people formulate and test hypotheses and, sometimes, let Occam's Razor creep into the room. As for your stating, "a source like Attkisson" you're still trying to suggestively deflect from the story to the reporter. I suppose deflection will work on some folks around here, I am just not one of them,
Click to expand...
My thoughts and conclusions exactly!
 
The former head of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove, seems to have had something to say on the subject at this SOURCE. Also, he is or was chair of the Board for the University of London. It seems he may have the same thoughts on the subject as Attkinsson, who some were so quick to disparage.

Edit Note: You can be reasonably certain that Sir Richard knows a lot more on the subject than he's telling. There's also a chance he's misdirecting.
 
Last edited:
Investigative reporter of some note and independence, Sharyl Attkinsson has dug into the origins of covid-19 and put together a video.....

It seems he may have the same thoughts on the subject as Attkinsson, who some were so quick to disparage.

Are you stalking? What part of "I don't care about Attkinsson" are you having trouble with?

Since you started off this discussion by praising Attkinsson, and then respond to any criticism of her with anger, it sounds to me as if you are trying to have it both ways.

On the other hand, I pretty much agree with the MIT study you quoted in note #17. I think bats are responsible for a lot of disease in the world, and there is probably plenty of research going on that the general public is unaware of. My son and his ex-wife (his wife at the time) went on a trip which included a cave visit. It may have been Carlsbad Caverns. A few days later, she came down with a case of histoplasmosis, which is spread by bat guano. She got a bad eye infection from it, which permanently damaged her eyesight, though she partially recovered most of her eyesight; at least, she can drive again. But it's interesting that both of these awful diseases do seem to be spread by bats.

It's entirely possible that the Chinese scientists may have inadvertently exposed the public to Covid, without realizing what they were doing, then, to save face, tried to cover it up.
 
Sunny said:
Investigative reporter of some note and independence, Sharyl Attkinsson has dug into the origins of covid-19 and put together a video..

It's entirely possible that the Chinese scientists may have inadvertently exposed the public to Covid, without realizing what they were doing, then, to save face, tried to cover it up.
Click to expand...
Bingo!
 
One of the things that seems to be overlooked on origin are the dates. One date that contradicts some versions on the origin is that traces of the virus were found in Spain in spring of 2019 almost a full year prior to spread in the US. The date's important because alot hang their hats on international military exercises in China in fall of 2019.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...wage-sample-spanish-study-shows-idUSKBN23X2HQ

So does that mean Chinese migrants brought into Europe from somewhere in China or did travelers from another place?
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top