I think a great deal depends on the individual. I particularly like the broad range of people i can communicate with online. But of course i prefer F2F with family.
I have never needed as much social interaction as others, and have always been uncomfortable in crowded situations. The brief public exchanges with acquaintances and clerks when running errands is enough for me.
I prefer in person or telephone. Electronic okay for quick superficial.
See, i feel cyberspace, particularly on forums like this, lends itself to and can encourage more 'in depth' discussions than F2F because--
There can be back and forth exchanges over several days. Because it is all written. If a complex subject, you can mull it over for awhile. Which if it produced emotionally charged feelings can help you consider the more objectively, rationally.
In purely verbal talks, unless recorded, it is easier for people to deny saying something inflammatory, insulting and/or inappropriate.
In person some misunderstandings more likely to end the conversation, and lead to avoiding that topic with that person. While that can happen online too, i for one take !ore time coming to that conclusion online than in person. But online there's more opportunity for clarifying an opinion someone has a visceral response to. Often the difficulties lay more in different uses of language than in reality.
Many words have both denotations (original, official definition) and connotations (emotional feelings aroused by, associated with it). Even if we agree on denotation of word our response to its connotations may be different, and not everyone is going respond the same to those connotations.
This is part of why with my few 3D world best friends now deceased in depth F2F or on phone conversations happen only with my kids, and grandson.