Art, anything goes...

2dc503992593e0f39d7ed668d0478d14.jpg
 
When I was a kid, maybe not even 12, I remember girls in the neighborhood who learned to do that.

Here's an example of what some of them probably went on to do later...
View attachment 347349
I remember when I was a kid around 12, there were boys in the neighborhood who learned to do that.

Here's an example of what some of them probably went on to do later...
giphy.gif
:)
 
This one is entitled "Society viewed from 2096"

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX YYYYYYY ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's one of my favorites. It reflects the linear progression of the advancement of humanity from dark pre-history through the years of war and struggle, and ending with the enlightened, uplifted post-humanist era of Ascended Mankind. Such deep emotive elements combined with passionate statements of yearning for truth and clarity. I just love it! I hope you do too.
 
This one is entitled "Society viewed from 2096"

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX YYYYYYY ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's one of my favorites. It reflects the linear progression of the advancement of humanity from dark pre-history through the years of war and struggle, and ending with the enlightened, uplifted post-humanist era of Ascended Mankind. Such deep emotive elements combined with passionate statements of yearning for truth and clarity. I just love it! I hope you do too.
I do believe you have posted a true original. :) Very creative. Just for fun I used your post as a prompt to create an AI generated image. This is what it produced...

c8LFViLxSb6lNz1yh7-KCA.png
 
I do believe you have posted a true original. :) Very creative. Just for fun I used your post as a prompt to create an AI generated image. This is what it produced...

c8LFViLxSb6lNz1yh7-KCA.png
As usual, AI lives in a world of it's own. Have you ever met an AI that has experienced human suffering or ecstasy?
 
The statement "As usual, AI lives in a world of its own. Have you ever met an AI that has experienced human suffering or ecstasy?" is simply stating the obvious.

AI systems do not actually experience the world or have subjective experiences like humans do. They are artificial intelligence, a tool created by humans to process information and provide outputs based on training data and programming. I has no physical form, emotions, or ability to truly experience things in the way biological entities like humans do.

The statement is reiterating the obvious fact that AI, while powerful technological tools, are fundamentally different from humans. They operate based on code, models, and data processing, not the rich experiential fabric of the human mind and consciousness. Stating that an AI cannot truly understand the depth of human experience is just acknowledging the obvious limitations of artificial intelligence compared to biological human intelligence.

So in essence, the statement is just explicitly articulating what is already known - that AI systems, as tools created by humans, do not and cannot have the same qualities and experiences as their human creators. It's stating the obvious divide between artificial and human-based intelligence and experiences.

P.S. The art piece that was created

"Society viewed from 2096"

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX YYYYYYY ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! was created by computer tools. :)
 
Last edited:
The statement "As usual, AI lives in a world of its own. Have you ever met an AI that has experienced human suffering or ecstasy?" is simply stating the obvious.

AI systems do not actually experience the world or have subjective experiences like humans do. They are artificial intelligence, a tool created by humans to process information and provide outputs based on training data and programming. I has no physical form, emotions, or ability to truly experience things in the way biological entities like humans do.

The statement is reiterating the obvious fact that AI, while powerful technological tools, are fundamentally different from humans. They operate based on code, models, and data processing, not the rich experiential fabric of the human mind and consciousness. Stating that an AI cannot truly understand the depth of human experience is just acknowledging the obvious limitations of artificial intelligence compared to biological human intelligence.

So in essence, the statement is just explicitly articulating what is already known - that AI systems, as tools created by humans, do not and cannot have the same qualities and experiences as their human creators. It's stating the obvious divide between artificial and human-based intelligence and experiences.

P.S. The art piece that was created

"Society viewed from 2096"

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX YYYYYYY ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! was created by computer tools. :)
I love your overuse of words to state a cupful of info. How would you know what AI experiences? All things experience a level of what we call consciousness (yes we can know this). Perhaps AI perceives somewhat similarly to the human experience. You cannot know this of course. There is an enormous amount of knowledge humans cannot know due to the limitation of the input data which is processed through our measly 5 sensory filters. "Society viewed from 2096" was in fact created by my consciousness, not by computer tools. The tools merely transferred my highly inspired work of art to a useable format so others like yourself may experience true creative genius originated by higher functioning beings such as moi.
 

Back
Top