Attention!

SifuPhil said:
BWAhahahahaha!

Here's a hint - it's a slang name for a sub-culture - comprised mostly of Millenials.
Click to expand...

Phil -- is it this "red pill?"

"For Red Pillers, genuine reality goes something like this: Female oppression is a myth and men are the ones holding the short end of the stick. That said, men and women are inherently different due to evolution, so each gender should carry out its designated role in society. For example, females should raise children at home and men should work and have sex with women."

So -- umm -- which side of this are you on, anyway??
 
Butterfly said:
Phil -- is it this "red pill?"

"For Red Pillers, genuine reality goes something like this: Female oppression is a myth and men are the ones holding the short end of the stick. That said, men and women are inherently different due to evolution, so each gender should carry out its designated role in society. For example, females should raise children at home and men should work and have sex with women."

So -- umm -- which side of this are you on, anyway??
Click to expand...

I think that was the SJW side of their beliefs you're referring to. It's a view held not only by Red Pillers, as I'm sure you know.

For instance, the majority of the large publishing houses are run by women. Getting anything published that is not in their particular mien is extremely difficult.

Men and women ARE different, at least the last time I checked.

What side am I on? That would be telling.
 
Shalimar said:
These are peeps looking for some(all) women to blame for their social ills. Go ahead and rant. I did after reading their spew. Emailed a friends and ranted big time.
Click to expand...

As I understood it, this group strives NOT to blame anyone but themselves for any set-backs in life - one of the things I admire about them.

If my article caused rants then good - maybe I'll get a few more page-views out of it.

How did we get on this topic on this thread anyway?
 
By the way, Butterfly - the piece you quoted was originally from Business Insider from 2013, and they had quite a few errors as concerns the Red Pill. For example, not all RPers believe women should be barefoot and pregnant.

If, as the article maintains, RP is "creepy" because of its "cult-like character", what does that make feminism?
 
I lack the amount of information to make a clear case. All I know is, the stuff I read was horrible, and I have a strong stomach. As for the Inference re feminism being a cult, I find that interesting. Since when is striving for parity in the patriarchy a

devolution into

cult status? We make seventy cents on the dollar in Canada, worst among developed nations. Doubt America is much better. Many careers are still run by the old boys network. Men and women are different, but deserve to be treated as equals. Males

are still the privileged sex by reason of gender, rather than capability. Not acceptable.
 
Shalimar said:
I lack the amount of information to make a clear case. All I know is, the stuff I read was horrible, and I have a strong stomach. As for the Inference re feminism being a cult, I find that interesting. Since when is striving for parity in the patriarchy a devolution into cult status? We make seventy cents on the dollar in Canada, worst among developed nations. Doubt America is much better. Many careers are still run by the old boys network. Men and women are different, but deserve to be treated as equals. Males are still the privileged sex by reason of gender, rather than capability. Not acceptable.
Click to expand...

Perhaps the stuff you read was written with a slant, a hidden agenda? Perhaps it was not fact-based but an assassination piece? It's like the political articles - rarely reporting facts, just rumors and innuendos.

Re: feminism cult - it becomes a cult when some of its followers act in a cult-like manner. Both sides are guilty in that regard.

According to one article by CNN, the gender parity gap in Canada is 62% - in the U.S. it's 64%, so I would say we're equally dismal. Equal pay for equal work is only logical.

If men and women are different, how can they be treated the same?

Males have not been seen as privileged because of their gender - it's because historically they are the protectors. Biologically, for the most part, men are stronger and more aggressive than women - traits that supported their protector roles. Women do not have the same muscle mass or fast-twitch reflexes, but they have stronger bonding and familial instincts, making them suitable for (gasp!) their roles as family centers.

Going against nature is going against the Tao.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top