I would have sworn that cockroaches have sex for fun!I've read where the only mammal - other than humans - that has sex for fun is the dolphins.
I would have sworn that cockroaches have sex for fun!I've read where the only mammal - other than humans - that has sex for fun is the dolphins.
Not so in Australia - extremely few babies available for adoption and most people would not be able to do so.Possibly, in today's world, money and avoiding the necessary lifestyle change may cause some folks to avoid having children.
No one NEEDS to go without children if they really want a family. Adoptions are available if a regular birth is not possible.
Have you asked a cockroach about that? They have lives too (not in my house, though, to make that clear).oops I read that as animals, not mammals. cockroaches don't count.
I don't have them either! I'm pretty sure cockroaches aren't mammals.Have you asked a cockroach about that? They have lives too (not in my house, though, to make that clear).
oops I read that as animals, not mammals. cockroaches don't count.
That is a very common misconception, no pun intended; in fact, Catholics believe that every act of sex should be open to procreation. There's a difference.I had a couple of relatives, my parents age, who believed sex was for procreation only. They were super strict Catholics. So that kind of thing did exist.
Not at all.Does that mean that someone born infertile must be celibate because they cannot possibly procreate?
Simply not true! Many animal species have plenty of sex for fun. For example,I've read where the only mammal - other than humans - that has sex for fun is the dolphins.
The Catholic church exactly for this reason refused to execute and even bless marriages between a female and a paralyzed male who couldn't perform the act. As I studied ecclesiastical law in the 1980s this still was quite common. Only logical for such an inhuman 'religion'.Does that mean that someone born infertile must be celibate because they cannot possibly procreate?
Don't forget the tomcat who pushes the cat down to perform the act. This looks more like a rape than an act for lust, at least for her.Regarding animals having sex for fun,
just look at dogs humping you can’t tell me he or she doesn’t have a smile on their face?
I've always wondered why most religions have a big bugaboo about sex. It's the same as we are supposed to eat food, only as nourishment, but not savor nor enjoy it.
The Catholic church exactly for this reason refused to execute and even bless marriages between a female and a paralyzed male who couldn't perform the act. As I studied ecclesiastical law in the 1980s this still was quite common. Only logical for such an inhuman 'religion'.
I've always thought that, too. I recently attended a wedding at which the bride and groom selected that as one of their readings.In my opinion the "Song of Songs" (also called the "Song of Solomon") has the most lyrical and affectionate descriptions of desire and love between man and woman.
i am probably too old to make a baby, however, I practice as much as my wife allows me too. Practice may or may not lead to perfection but it sure funSex for procreation only? OK, here's my take.
You've heard that people "practice" a certain religion, I think we need to practice for procreation. Nuff said.
did they sleep in separate beds?That is a very common misconception, no pun intended; in fact, Catholics believe that every act of sex should be open to procreation. There's a difference.