grahamg
Old codger
- Location
- South of Manchester, UK
Without veering off topic too far I hope, and into areas we shouldn't go, there is a question as to how far the state should interfere or take over the role of parents, where the parents are thought to be failing, or "not acting in the best interests of the child"!Well said.
I'm sick to death of all the analyzing and rationalizing and excusing.
Bullies need to face the consequences of their own behavior. IMO, if there were more consequence facing in this world, society as a whole would be much better off.
We've heard an argument that any child might be constrained from ever bullying anyone, if only someone had done this or that when they were aged two years, "surely a strong argument for government interference if you believe it to be true", (I don't of course).
Others besides myself have mentioned whether or not a child at any age is being loved, and I may have said, "once or twice" here, or elsewhere on this forum, that the interference of government or its officials, or "others", all tends to undermine parental authority, and in my view the chance one parent, or even both parents, might show the love required to their child.