tbeltrans
Senior Member
That is exactly the kind of response I would expect from you. Others here may well be interested in current scientific research.If it lies in the context of quantum physics I would not pursue the meaning.
Tony
That is exactly the kind of response I would expect from you. Others here may well be interested in current scientific research.If it lies in the context of quantum physics I would not pursue the meaning.
Leonard Sachs would have been proud of you, (presenter of a show called, "The Good Old Days" back in the 1960s/1970s, known for extravagant language introducing musical hall style acts!).How about ubiquitous, omnipresent simultaneity.![]()
Don't blame you. Whoever understands QP deserves a prizeIf it lies in the context of quantum physics I would not pursue the meaning.
Those of us outside the scientific community can understand bits and pieces of it. We can also experiment with quantum computing via an account at IBM. Write your model, submit it as a job on IBM's cloud, and get the results. Then you can get pretty close to hands on with a piece of this emerging technology. Be curious.Don't blame you. Whoever understands QP deserves a prize![]()
They say Einstein fought against accepting some aspects of quantum physics, but almost every devices we use now, such as these computers etc., are somehow based upon its application.Don't blame you. Whoever understands QP deserves a prize![]()
Good observation.They say Einstein fought against accepting some aspects of quantum physics, but almost every devices we use now, such as these computers etc., are somehow based upon its application.