Last edited:
Y’ know, in this democracy, most folks have happily chosen not to poop, pee or spit snot on the sidewalks out of consideration for others and their own wellbeing. Does that interfere with your freedom of choice? I would certainly complain if people felt that not being allowed to poop or pee whenever and wherever they felt like it interferes with their freedom of choice, and went ahead and did it.
And I make the choice to continue wearing a mask as long as I feel it protects me from people who like to express their freedom by expelling pathogens into the air, and that there are odds that the pathogens could be harmful. When they go away and the probability lessens, I’ll dump the masks.
You wouldn't be thinking about British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, would you? He's the guy that likes to play "elbow" with other "good ole' boys" but I just read that the British public is getting pretty fed up with him. He's the guy that told his country to get with it when it comes to social distancing and the wearing of masks and then broke the rules by "partying hardy" with a bunch of friends of his. Makes me wonder?There is nothing wrong with the mask per se. What is wrong is telling other people to wear a mask and then not doing it yourself.
Same here. We had daily "Emergency" news conferences with the chief medical experts, the president, mayor & governor telling all of us to "social distance" while they stood shoulder-to-shoulder. They also started the mask mandates - but of course they didn't have to wear masks.You wouldn't be thinking about British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, would you? He's the guy that likes to play "elbow" with other "good ole' boys" but I just read that the British public is getting pretty fed up with him. He's the guy that told his country to get with it when it comes to social distancing and the wearing of masks and then broke the rules by "partying hardy" with a bunch of friends of his. Makes me wonder?