Do you believe we never went to the moon?

fuzzybuddy said:
Maybe it's best to just walk away. Some people will never let reality get in the way of their beliefs.
Click to expand...
Well, I personally don't have any bets placed on a rooster in that fight. So either way, it's OK by me.
 

David777 said:
I'll add that my father at that time, worked as a rep for the Connecticut company that built the large rectangular white backpack astronauts used. Post flight, he would fly down to Houston to recover the backpacks that always contained some lunar dust he vacuumed up. Personally knew at acquaintance levels, some of the astronauts. And yes mr dave does possess small amounts of that Moon dust.
Click to expand...
Ok, sure you do. Dust can be any dust. Calling it moon dust means nothing. And that link you attached shows and proves nothing. The other link with pictures are ridiculous. Too grainy, could be fake, poor cgi and so on.

But....

Big question...how did the president of the united states talk to the astronauts live on camera on National TV, via a landline with the guys on the moon with no delay whatsoever? Today in 2024 there is occasional delays on Skype, Telegram and even poor cell service in some cities. But he talked to them via satellite coms, on his handheld phone in 1969?

Then how did they film the lander coming down on mars? How did a camera get set up to film them coming down>
 
Tazx said:
Big question...how did the president of the united states talk to the astronauts live on camera on National TV, via a landline with the guys on the moon with no delay whatsoever?
Click to expand...
Nixon spoke with Aldrin and Armstrong by landline but also radio transmission. The call was routed to mission control in Houston from the White House and then to the astronauts through the CapCom communicator... that's how it was "real-time."
 

CallMeKate said:
Nixon spoke with Aldrin and Armstrong by landline but also radio transmission. The call was routed to mission control in Houston from the White House and then to the astronauts through the CapCom communicator... that's how it was "real-time."
Click to expand...
Ok regardless of how the call was made, where is the delay? All those connections and no delay? What is the transmission time of radio waves from the moon surface through the 2 radiation belts, through clouds, possible weather in various levels of atmosphere, down to mission control, with no interference>then forward the call to Wash DC to the oval office to a landline. Yet you can lose cell service in a concrete building, going through a tunnel, in certain hilly areas etc.

I appreciate the info and the explanation but still remarkable and unbelievable? I mean you watch CNN sometimes and there is a delay from overseas. You always hear the hosts say 'sorry about the delay' etc. Direct clear communication to the moon was highly unlikely in 1969.
 
Yes, I know we actually landed on the moon and the footprints and added tracks are still available to provide proof.

The evidence is readily available if one cares to look. So, let's move on!
 
Last edited:
CallMeKate said:
There actually was a delay of 2 or 3 seconds. That's how long it took/takes for the radio signals to reach the moon. The delay was minimized for broadcast to the public.
Click to expand...
Sorry wrong. There is a much longer delay. But I guess the delay and lack of signals we had in Afghanistan due to satellite weather interference and mountainous regions meant nothing. I mean all we had was the best military coms avail. Better than any civy stuff, but no you must be right!
 
Timewise 60+ said:
Yes, I know we actually landed on the moon and the footprints and added tracks are still available to provide proof.

The evidence is readily available of one cares to look. So, let's move on!
Click to expand...
Well I agree we should drop it, but the photos you speak of are not even close to verified. No clear resolution, no verification, nasa would not provide the photos for independant study. So not likely.
 
Tazx said:
Sorry wrong. There is a much longer delay.
Click to expand...
You could have done your own research on this, but I did it for you. Perhaps you know more than AI... and that's fine if you want to think that. But since I took the time to do it, I'll be a peach and share:
"Radio signals take approximately 1.28 seconds to travel from Earth to the moon. Since signals need to go both ways, the total round-trip time is about 2.56 seconds."
 
Tazx said:
Well I agree we should drop it, but the photos you speak of are not even close to verified. No clear resolution, no verification, nasa would not provide the photos for independant study. So not likely.
Click to expand...

We still use mirrors left on the moon for testing of lasers. We bounce signals from them.
 
silly nonsense. we went to the moon. The alternate press has an answer for everything including world war 2. It didn't happen, the holocaust is make believe, we didn't go to the moon. Maui was the result of a laser weapon, hurricanes are derived from the deep state trying to kill us all.
The list goes on and on and on and on.
You want to believe that all history is fake. Go right ahead.
In the mean time the rest of us will try to carry on with the world we know exist.
 
rbtvgo said:
silly nonsense. we went to the moon. The alternate press has an answer for everything including world war 2. It didn't happen, the holocaust is make believe, we didn't go to the moon. Maui was the result of a laser weapon, hurricanes are derived from the deep state trying to kill us all.
The list goes on and on and on and on.
You want to believe that all history is fake. Go right ahead.
In the mean time the rest of us will try to carry on with the world we know exist.
Click to expand...

When "doing your own research" equates to watching a random video on Youtube by some no-name, then there's no reason to believe anything. We're probably in a simulation. Oh wait........... :D
 
VaughanJB said:
When "doing your own research" equates to watching a random video on Youtube by some no-name, then there's no reason to believe anything. We're probably in a simulation. Oh wait........... :D
Click to expand...
Oh, you think that's funny, this being a simulation? As the world as you know it disappears from your understanding. When knowing is replaced by digital 1's &O's. When what you see IS what you believe. The truth, hidden so far behind an illusion. Then what are you gonna do!? :)
 
Tazx said:
Well I agree we should drop it, but the photos you speak of are not even close to verified. No clear resolution, no verification, nasa would not provide the photos for independant study. So not likely.
Click to expand...
So Tazx...take your own advice and "drop it"! You have no way of knowing what I know...!
 
Last edited:
Brookswood said:
If NASA actually landed on the Moon they could have easily proved it by bringing back a hunk of green cheese.
Click to expand...

cheese-moon-andrew-hitchen.jpg
 
rbtvgo said:
silly nonsense. we went to the moon. The alternate press has an answer for everything including world war 2. It didn't happen, the holocaust is make believe, we didn't go to the moon. Maui was the result of a laser weapon, hurricanes are derived from the deep state trying to kill us all.
The list goes on and on and on and on.
You want to believe that all history is fake. Go right ahead.
In the mean time the rest of us will try to carry on with the world we know exist.
Click to expand...
I think my dad and many others that were in WW 2 would like their time or lives back if it was a hoax. This ridiculous ignorance of history is why many victims of the holocaust allowed themselves to be videotaped so that their stories are preserved for eternity. In the holocaust museum people can walk up to an image and start asking questions of the image and they are answered. I saw it on 60 minutes and it was amazing. Like you I don’t understand how people can deny history.
 
Teacher Terry said:
I think my dad and many others that were in WW 2 would like their time or lives back if it was a hoax. This ridiculous ignorance of history is why many victims of the holocaust allowed themselves to be videotaped so that their stories are preserved for eternity. In the holocaust museum people can walk up to an image and start asking questions of the image and they are answered. I saw it on 60 minutes and it was amazing. Like you I don’t understand how people can deny history.
Click to expand...
History has a way of getting distorted way out of whack. You know, "He took advantage of me!" TWSS
"I'm headed for Texas." TWHT
Why is Texas Population exploding? TWTA ... (that's where they are) ...
 
papa tiger said:
History has a way of getting distorted way out of whack. You know, "He took advantage of me!" TWSS
"I'm headed for Texas." TWHT
Why is Texas Population exploding? TWTA ... (that's where they are) ...
Click to expand...
Good all the rednecks that want to control women can move to Texas and be happy together. I feel sorry for the normal people that can’t afford to move.
 
Teacher Terry said:
Good all the rednecks that want to control women can move to Texas and be happy together. I feel sorry for the normal people that can’t afford to move.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately there seem to be more and more people that think that controlling women is a good thing. I read a book recently on rhetoric --sorry can't give you the title since goodreads.com has gone nuts since amazon took over; thanks, Jeff, thanks a lot! :mad:--where the U.S. author mentioned how she wished she had used better rhetoric in the p0litical arguments she had with her father before he passed away. Anyhow, she mentioned that the most recent arguments were because he had joined both an online and a face-to-face group that was all about getting the vote taken away from U.S. women. Right here in the U.S. In this day and age.

So it's not us "wimmen gettin' all hysterical again." Nope.
 
officerripley said:
Unfortunately there seem to be more and more people that think that controlling women is a good thing. I read a book recently on rhetoric --sorry can't give you the title since goodreads.com has gone nuts since amazon took over; thanks, Jeff, thanks a lot! :mad:--where the U.S. author mentioned how she wished she had used better rhetoric in the p0litical arguments she had with her father before he passed away. Anyhow, she mentioned that the most recent arguments were because he had joined both an online and a face-to-face group that was all about getting the vote taken away from U.S. women. Right here in the U.S. In this day and age.

So it's not us "wimmen gettin' all hysterical again." Nope.
Click to expand...
can't understand a word you are saying?????????????????????????????
 
Really? What she was saying seemed quite clear.

Which part couldn't you understand?
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top