As a militant anti-ageist, I use no descriptors for a person of any age, and if someone asks my age, I simply answer, "old enough!"
I know people who very much dislike being called "elderly", and prefer to be called "senior".
What about you?
"Elderly" does have a negative connotation to me -- so does "senior," which always sounds to me like a cutesy euphemism for "elderly" anyway. Why can't we just be people, without the labels?
:hatlaugh1:HAPPY BIRTHDAY....Elderly tends to be synonymous with decrepit. Very few of us want to be seen in that light.
I am 85 today, but that is just old.
I agree words like geriatric, elderly, senior, should be used to describe groups, services, facilities, etc... and not used to describe individuals.
Just use my name and please when I get older don't talk about me like I'm a dog at the veterinarian's office talk to me like I'm still a human being.
I'm always sort of surprised when reading the newspaper, I see a description of "an elderly person," usually someone who was assaulted or something like that. Then it gives their age, and it's often
younger than I am! Somehow, anyone younger than me can NOT be elderly!
Treeguy, don't hit me ok?:love_heart:
I don't think that means what you think it means. If you're an anti-ageist, then you're AGAINST ageism, unless your definition of ageism is different than mine.
Ageism (also spelled "agism") is stereotyping and discrimination against individuals or groups on the basis of their age. ... The term was coined in 1969 by Robert Neil Butler to describe discrimination against seniors, and patterned on sexism and racism. WIKIPEDIA