ElCastor
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern CA
Sorry to disappoint, but my agnosticism is applied to one belief and one belief only -- the existence of God. I do that out of courtesy and respect for those who do believe. Unfortunately you are beginning to annoy me. Please reserve your comments for someone else, now and in the future.Although that dictionary definition of agnosticism seems to make sense at first, it becomes pretty meaningless upon further thought. It can be applied to any fictitious belief. Such as:
The belief that there is a Santa Claus cannot be known with certainty.
The belief that Covid is largely a manufactured fear promulgated by the pharmaceutical companies, and also the belief that the vaccine doesn't make any difference; the truth about this cannot be known with any certainty.
The belief that the earth is not more than 5,000 years old cannot be known with any certainty.
The belief that all those miracles happening exactly as described in the Bible cannot be proved or disproved with any certainty. All we have to go by is common sense, science, and probability.
And so on. Point #3, that the "essential nature of things" is unknowable, or at least unknown, is so vague that it's a meaningless statement. What is an essential nature?
Last edited: