OldEngineer
Member
- Location
- San Diego, CA
Wikipedia has a lot of good things going for it and it is a great source of information if used correctly, keeping in mind it is user-generated and user-edited.Goddess me, it's so strange... I find myself doing more and more research for people online. That's one reason I gave up on something called Neighbours site.
Just a few keystrokes and Bob's your uncle, Fanny's your aunt...
Three sites are my best go-to to find answers.
Wikipedia
E-How
YouTube for every DIY (mind you some are bad, but some are amazing, just watch)
Medical, it's WebMD, then NHS Scotland, England or Wales
I'm always looking for natural remedies, then no need to visit the surgery. Doctors are available, unfortunately, the receptionists are the ones saying no availability... Yup, hard facts, so you've got to research for alternatives, BUT providing you know what ails you, of course...
In charity shop called Ardgowan Hospice, I found a second hand book by Tommy Walsh who used to be with Charlie and Allen Tishmarch on that garden makeover.
I took it, it's jammed pack with good DIY...
Well, regardless, if you need help, just howler! If I can find it I will, and as long as it's safe...
For me Wikipedia requires special consideration. It is user-generated and with some stealth, hackers can (and did) falsify information. It's advantage is that it is really an encyclopedia, and it has current information on almost every significant topic. I just double-check it when the information is fresh and hasn't been fact-checked by volunteer experts. Sometimes bad info slips through. I do love and use it, although I would not put it at the top of my list.
A while back, Katherine Maher, CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation said this in the Washington Post.
“Wikipedia is very open about that fact that we’re not a reliable source. It’s actually a tenet of Wikipedia, which isn’t to say we’re not a good place to start,” Maher said. “We are a great place to start. We just want people to have the ability to read the content on Wikipedia with a critical eye.”