Understandable does not equal acceptable, I see this as an example of the craziness of life and death in the USA.Sorry, but if you think it is "understandable" (your word, not mine) then to you it is acceptable. We've all been desperate, but I don't think any of us on here have committed such a cowardly act. Sad that you are okay with it. "Actions have consequences" indeed...
Dude- you can't unsay what you've already said. "Understandable" does = acceptable. "Actions have consequences" = the guy had it coming. Your words, not mine. And you have made it your circus/monkey by your posts. SMHUnderstandable does not equal acceptable, I see this as an example of the craziness of life and death in the USA.
Not my circus, not my monkeys.
None of us can choose how we feel, all of us can choose how we react.
You really are pushing it acceptable means that something is understandable and tolerable, see the difference.Dude- you can't unsay what you've already said. "Understandable" does = acceptable. "Actions have consequences" = the guy had it coming. Your words, not mine. And you have made it your circus/monkey by your posts. SMH
For the last time, you've said what you've said, and you can't unsay it now. Semantic waffling aside, it is clear where you stand, and that, since "actions have consequences", the CEO was fair game to you.You really are pushing it acceptable means that something is understandable and tolerable, see the difference.
It's still not my circus nor monkeys, I'm on the outside looking in.
Your wilful ignorance is not something to walk away from. Mean what you say and say what you mean but do not misrepresent what I have said. You have quoted me, I can't and won't try to change my words. If you choose to selectively interpret what I said then that's on you. Understandable and acceptable have always had different meanings and always will. Whether or not I think that the CEO is fair game is conjecture on your part, as that jacket said, I don't care.For the last time, you've said what you've said, and you can't unsay it now. Semantic waffling aside, it is clear where you stand, and that, since "actions have consequences", the CEO was fair game to you.
Moving on...
You're full of chit w the strawman you're pulling. He did not write what you say he did. PERIOD.For the last time, you've said what you've said, and you can't unsay it now. Semantic waffling aside, it is clear where you stand, and that, since "actions have consequences", the CEO was fair game to you.
Moving on...
So you're saying it was a good shoot?I wonder how many deaths he was responsible for by pressuring his employees to deny claims in pursuit of profit maximization?
There's some dark humour out there already, enough said.I wonder how many deaths he was responsible for by pressuring his employees to deny claims in pursuit of profit maximization?
Here we go again, a question is construed as a statement that wasn't saidSo you're saying it was a good shoot?![]()
It was a sarcastic remark. Sorry the emoji didn't reflect that.There's some dark humour out there already, enough said.
Here we go again, a question is construed as a statement that wasn't said
"Thoughts and prayers" aren't covered under your current plan. Your claim has been denied.Thoughts and Prayers.
Interesting that you also endorse the shooting as justified. "Understandable" and "actions have consequences' were his words, not mine.You're full of chit w the strawman you're pulling. He did not write what you say he did. PERIOD.
My understanding is that they "started" by saying the conference was cancelled.If you're interested in the backpack the shooter was wearing, look at this video...
x.com
Also, it's interesting that the UnitedHealth conference still started on time, even though their CEO had been killed a little over an hour earlier.![]()
So far you deliberately conflated understandable with acceptable and now have accused 2 of us of endorsing a murder when those endorsements did not happen.Interesting that you also endorse the shooting as justified. "Understandable" and "actions have consequences' were his words, not mine.
Jeebus.
@BuckeyeThis might be part of the motive...
View attachment 385845
You live in a country with millions of people with millions of guns.Interesting that you also endorse the shooting as justified. "Understandable" and "actions have consequences' were his words, not mine.
Jeebus.
Seems like it's a deliberate attempt to claim that you and I are morally inferior by denigrating us in a most deceitful manner.Look at the graph.
You live in a country with millions of people with millions of guns.
Ask yourself about the United customers who suffered and died because of claim delay and denial.
Can you really not understand why someone would feel aggrieved enough to take drastic measures?
The inscriptions on the brass illustrate the level of premeditation and intended consequences.