Here' an intriguing story on ID channel....

Today the judge is saying she's 22. I'm not all that familiar w/the case re: her (real) age at adoption, what the adoptive parents are claiming etc. But, it's they said/she said. Whose zooming who in all this?
 

I asked Chat-GPT Why the judge ruled she was 22...

The documentary “The Curious Case of Natalia Grace” reveals how the judge eventually determined she was really an adult. Legal expert Beth Karas explains in the six-part series: “The judge had a petition prepared by an attorney that would lay out the arguments for why this person is not the age they believe she is – she is actually an adult. “Nobody knows quite what age, but she has not grown in four years, so the judge came up with his own little formula: ‘Well, you stop growing at 18 – if she hasn’t grown in four years then she’s at least 18 when she entered their lives. And I’m gonna add four years’. “He said, ‘Okay, I find you 22’.”

Curiouser and curiouser. :)
 
This is a s. show. I don't know what to believe. And why did the first family put her up for adoption again? One convincing thing on these new episodes were the dental records. They clearly showed adult teeth under baby teeth which would indicate a child. I have not watched every minute. It's such a she said, she said. He said, he said.
 
Watched it last eve and what strikes me is how Christine is so
quiet on all of it, she is not out even defending herself..it is strange that the Son who is supposed to be a genius, does not
seem to be very smart at all, the whole thing smacks of a giant
cluster%%%%%, with Natalia at the center. I believe in her but
have reser vations about some of her statements...
 
Well last nites episode just created more questions and hardly
any answers.....she got adopted by that family she's been living
with, all happy and lovey dovey, then at the very end the parents were all but cursing her out and saying they were through with any thing about her !!????!!!???
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top