Hillary Clinton The Queen by Hugh Hewitt

One of his trashing books, The Brief Against Obama didn't make an impression in 2012 it seems, now this radio talk show character is targeting Hillary in a desperate attempt again. He's making lots of money though, selling his opinions to his fan base. No Lon, I didn't read it, I've heard enough of Hewitt on his radio shows not to be interested in reading his books.
 
Is that all Republicans know how to do? Trash their opponents? Seems to me someone should be able to win on their ideas and their merits, IF they were worth anything and not have to resort to smear campaigns and phony scandals..
 
And I suppose all the lefty authors only speak kindly of their political sames, just like the conservatives speak for their political sames.

Their books are only failures, both sides, if no books are ever sold. I doubt if either side of politics ever writes great selling books. None of those like famous books of the past that sold millions of copies. Or even the newer books that were made into films for being so popular.
 
I wish he would write a book on some solutions to the problems we're facing in America, something his peers would read and run with in the political arena....but that won't happen. They seem to only try to look better by making their "opponents' look bad, that is so transparent to most of us these days.
 
And I suppose all the lefty authors only speak kindly of their political sames, just like the conservatives speak for their political sames.

Their books are only failures, both sides, if no books are ever sold. I doubt if either side of politics ever writes great selling books. None of those like famous books of the past that sold millions of copies. Or even the newer books that were made into films for being so popular.

Would you, just for consistency sake... give us a list of some "Lefty authors" and the smear books they have penned?
 
No, I am saying that both sides do the same thing and it is in the perspective of the reader to decide if it is smear or lies. How are you doing as a reader?

I have no problem with either side as pumping up books are mostly exaggerations for the authors favorite ideas. I have no problems with reading either side of politics.
 
All I was asking you for was an example of a far left author smearing a Republican candidate.. If you are going to claim "both sides do it" then you should be able to give a few examples.
 
You are wasting your time. I just said I have no problems with either side and I read little of any political nonsense that some do put out.

Leave it alone. Find your own ideas of trash. I want no part of that type of entertainment. For the most part when I read I have no idea who the author is. If after reading I may just toss the article or book and never connect the author to any political ideas. Seems to be your sole idea is to find out if the author is right or left and make instant judgements right there. Seems to be a very hasty way to read and learn if you only read one type of writings.
 
You are wasting your time. I just said I have no problems with either side and I read little of any political nonsense that some do put out.

Leave it alone. Find your own ideas of trash. I want no part of that type of entertainment. For the most part when I read I have no idea who the author is. If after reading I may just toss the article or book and never connect the author to any political ideas. Seems to be your sole idea is to find out if the author is right or left and make instant judgements right there. Seems to be a very hasty way to read and learn if you only read one type of writings.

I believe it was LON who ordered the book and started the thread... Not me... SB and I just pointed out the author's history of smear books.
 
There goes your perspective of a smear book. If another person reads it and has no problems, that is fine. Until you read it, your opinion is just that. Nothing but an opinion, not a proof at all.
 
Last edited:
To fall prey to absolute preference for either party is precisely what that party's leadership has been hoping to achieve of it's "supporters".

No different than, "I would not drive a Ford (or Chevy); name or brand loyalty. Stupidity of the highest order, IMO. imp
 
Would you, just for consistency sake... give us a list of some "Lefty authors" and the smear books they have penned?

I can't think of any offhand QS, but here's a large choice of anti-Obama books written by the right, and Hugh Hewitt's is right there in the mix. His doing a similar thing with Hillary is no surprise.


The 2012 presidential election year has long come & gone, but it's still the season for opportunistic authors to publish their anti-Obama books, hoping to cash in on President Barack Obama's record disapproval rating.

Below I've compiled a short list of anti-Obama books, most of which have popped up in the past couple years about one of most unpopular U.S. presidents in recent memory.
Clicking an image below will take you to that book's page at Amazon.com, where as an Amazon affiliate I will earn a whopping 4% commission on any purchases that you would make during your visit there.

So in the event you would decide to add a book or two to your library, that will in effect help offset my cost of hosting this website.

So please feel free to shop till you drop.
smiley2.gif

 
And I suppose all the lefty authors only speak kindly of their political sames, just like the conservatives speak for their political sames.

Their books are only failures, both sides, if no books are ever sold. I doubt if either side of politics ever writes great selling books. None of those like famous books of the past that sold millions of copies. Or even the newer books that were made into films for being so popular.

Unfortunately, there is nothing good you can say about any of the conservatives who are running for prez. The only words that come to mind to describe this batch of losers are stupid, ignorant, naive, unrealistic, living in the dark ages, obnoxious, arrogant, sexist, racist, homophobic, fundamentalist, phony...................
 
Both parties are the same as they both hate the other side.

And for the US it is the two 'parties' that are making it impossible for the government to properly manage things. Our Constitution asks for people from various states and areas to represent their people. It has no comments about 'parties' to represent all the people of the nation. Which is what is happening these days.
 
Ah, right. I knew there were a few more words I was missing. :D

Next post: BobF accusing me of name-calling when in fact I was telling the truth.

I did not accuse you of name calling. You are totally mistaken with that charge against me. I blamed the entire party system which is opposed to the Constitutions set up for voter representation.
 
Both parties are the same as they both hate the other side.

And for the US it is the two 'parties' that are making it impossible for the government to properly manage things. Our Constitution asks for people from various states and areas to represent their people. It has no comments about 'parties' to represent all the people of the nation. Which is what is happening these days.

May I ask Bob.... How is it Constitutional for a mere 40 congressmen to completely disrupt our governmental process? Which is exactly what the Teapublicans in the House are doing. They are fully intent on destroying America and our political system. Remember... it is ONLY 40 out of 435 PLUS 100 Senators. Hardly seems constitutional does it?
 
I did not accuse you of name calling. You are totally mistaken with that charge against me. I blamed the entire party system which is opposed to the Constitutions set up for voter representation.

Can you not read? I didn't say I accused you, I said 'next post' meaning I knew what you would post next.
 
Anyone that uses the argument "both parties are the same" is simply not paying attention.

This is one of my pet peeves... It seems that every time the GOP is caught doing something unethical... the defense seems to be.. "Well, BOTH parties do it".. I call BS on that 99% of the time. NO.. both parties do NOT do it.. It's a complete false equivalency. I will continue to ask for examples every time I hear that nonsense.
 
Can you not read? I didn't say I accused you, I said 'next post' meaning I knew what you would post next.

Your post was not yet up when I posted. So we must have posted at the same time. It does happen often enough. Why blame me if not yet posted?
 


Back
Top