Warrigal
SF VIP
- Location
- Sydney, Australia
I understand your system, more or less, and I reckon it needs an overhaul to drag it in to the 21st century. However I realise that that is not likely to happen for reasons to do with the Constitution and history.It concerns the primaries which the political parties put on. The primaries are used to winnow down the field to one candidate from each party to compete in the general election. In the general one can vote for any party w/out restriction.
Some primaries are "open" which means any registered voter from any party can show up on primary voting day and vote for anyone w no party restrictions. Other primaries are "closed" and are restricted to members of it's own party which one must be registered to in advance.
My state has a closed primary so I register in that party that controls the outcome most of the time, otherwise I would get no voice at all into state and some local elections. We have a state-wide ballot measure this year which will, if it passes, change that. The closed primary in our state has led, in one party, to the election of candidates w the most extreme viewpoints; moderates are pushed aside in favor of the extremists. This ballot measure was fought tooth and nail by one party and the state. They love their power and don't mind disenfranchising the citizens to maintain and grow their power.
Our system could do with a bit of tweaking too, but our Constitution was written more than a century after the US one and although not easily amended, it is not nearly as hard to change. Six states are not as unmanageable as fifty.