Isis wife loses last appeal

mellowyellow

mellowyellow

Well-known Member
isis bride.jpg
Yesterday (Friday), the UK’s highest court ruled that Ms Begum should not be granted leave to enter the UK to pursue her appeal against the deprivation of her British citizenship.

The Supreme Court unanimously held that the Court of Appeal was wrong to find that Ms Begum should be allowed to enter the UK to pursue her appeal against the removal of her British citizenship.
 

Simply by being a member of this organisation, she and all the others are accessories to murder and just as guilty of the atrocities committed as those who carried them out.
 
DaveA said:
Would that include the terrorists who attacked the Capitol and bashed the head in of one of the Capitol police?
Click to expand...

Absolutely! We should Always have the Right to assemble and protest Peacefully....but when those protests descend into riots, property damage and personal injury....they should All be treated as Domestic Violence and the perpetrators should be given harsh prison sentences. That includes this Jan. riot, and all others, such as the BLM riots....IMO.
 
Don M. said:
Absolutely! We should Always have the Right to assemble and protest Peacefully....but when those protests descend into riots, property damage and personal injury....they should All be treated as Domestic Violence and the perpetrators should be given harsh prison sentences. That includes this Jan. riot, and all others, such as the BLM riots....IMO.
Click to expand...


Does that also include the guys that threw the tea into the harbor ?
 
rgp said:
Does that also include the guys that threw the tea into the harbor ?
Click to expand...

If you have to reach back 250 years to justify your position, you are overlooking a lot of pertinent events. I am of the opinion that people should obey the Law....regardless of whether they agree with the rules, or not. If they are not happy with the law, they should concentrate on getting the law changed, instead of violating it. I fully support peaceful protest, but when people turn violent, they should be treated accordingly.
 
Don M. said:
If you have to reach back 250 years to justify your position, you are overlooking a lot of pertinent events. I am of the opinion that people should obey the Law....regardless of whether they agree with the rules, or not. If they are not happy with the law, they should concentrate on getting the law changed, instead of violating it. I fully support peaceful protest, but when people turn violent, they should be treated accordingly.
Click to expand...

I don't need to reach back , just making a comparison, one that i believe to be valid.

I doubt that peaceful protest would have worked 250 years ago [it was tried], and not likely too now.

No matter your goal, one must be wiling to see it through to the end if your going to prevail, and sometimes that includes violence.

If the guys at the harbor would not have been willing to see it through to the end, we might still be speaking the queens English, as well as be living under the doctrine of the church of England .....

jus sayin'
 
You were doing great until
"we might still be speaking the queens English, as well as be living under the doctrine of the church of England ....."
Should have quit while you were ahead @rgp
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top