I've been sitting here looking at your comment Robusta and trying to figure out how to reply to you. It isn't easy, but in the spirit of my reply to Kitties I'm definitely trying.
I understand your point, but I don't think you understand my perspective on the issue of how animals are treated by our society. Perhaps if you had spent as many hours as I have reading and researching the various animal use industries, you might at the very least understand how someone could become as grieved as I feel about their situation. Mostly I have to hide my feelings and never make any mention of how abused they are and watch as the world continues to treat them like they are nothing. I think I've actually made that suggested remark once and I'm still friends with those folks. And on the off chance they decided to talk about me behind my back, then first of all, that doesn't say much about them as friends particularly if they chose to hold me up as an object of ridicule but secondly and more importantly to me, perhaps it may have planted a seed, provoked further thought on what I said, why I said it. Change in the human heart usually happens very slowly and may not be evident immediately or even for years, but if that seed is planted, there's always the possibility that it will take root at some point. And if they chose to be the kind of 'friend' who gossips and snickers, then maybe it's not such a bad idea to let go of those toxic personalities.
I think if you are going to participate in those industries, it is your responsibility to understand exactly what you are participating in. None of us have the right to hide from the results of our actions. If you are going to toss garbage out the window or throw it out to end up on the beach and then in the water, then you should know how you are killing seabirds and other wildlife. If you are pouring used oil down storm drains, then you have to know how you are killing salmon fry. If I say something unkind, then I should find out how I have hurt someones feelings. I think the fact that I phrased it as indicated is a consideration for my listener as I wouldn't and didn't go into the kind of detail that would give them the truest and fullest picture of all that is involved unless they asked followup questions or indicated some interest in continuing the conversation.
Killing animals and eating them is violence and that's just a fact and sanitizing it so that people can feel good not knowing, does nothing for the critters. It doesn't save a life and it doesn't even add any impetus to improvement in animal welfare standards. There's currently a move in society to get sows out of gestation crates and hens out of battery cages. Do you think that would have happened if people didn't become aware of their pain because other folks laid the situation out there for inspection? Those sows aren't moving out of gestation crates to keep me happy because I still won't eat pigs, but it's a sign that many people, have heard, have listened and have begun to care and are demanding 'change' even if they aren't going to make any greater change in this lifetime. And if you are a pig, even those incremental changes are significant.
So if you want to characterize all of that as strident, then so be it. But who ever said any form of evolution, be it physical or spiritual, happens gently and with smiles all around?