Traveler
Senior Member
- Location
- San Diego County
The English language sure is a very strange language. Take the followings as examples.
You DRIVE on a parkway, but you PARK on a driveway. Who came up with that one? Hmm ?
You have a PAIR of pants, meaning 1. But you have a shirt. Why do we call pants a pair, but not a shirt ?
I have a pair of boxer shorts, and my wife had a pair of panties (both meaning 1). But if she wanted to buy a bra (1), she would not ask for a PAIR of bras.
I can understand saying a pair of shoes, or a pair of socks because there are two. And I might understand saying a PAIR of pants because there are, obviously, two legs. So why does the same not apply to a shirt?
After all there are two sleeves.
Sometimes a pair of something applies to thing with two: a PAIR of pants, a PAIR of boxers, a PAIR of panties. Why not a PAIR of bras ? After all there are two, uh, two uh..... well you get the idea.
You DRIVE on a parkway, but you PARK on a driveway. Who came up with that one? Hmm ?
You have a PAIR of pants, meaning 1. But you have a shirt. Why do we call pants a pair, but not a shirt ?
I have a pair of boxer shorts, and my wife had a pair of panties (both meaning 1). But if she wanted to buy a bra (1), she would not ask for a PAIR of bras.
I can understand saying a pair of shoes, or a pair of socks because there are two. And I might understand saying a PAIR of pants because there are, obviously, two legs. So why does the same not apply to a shirt?
After all there are two sleeves.
Sometimes a pair of something applies to thing with two: a PAIR of pants, a PAIR of boxers, a PAIR of panties. Why not a PAIR of bras ? After all there are two, uh, two uh..... well you get the idea.