Paco Dennis
SF VIP
- Location
- Mid-Missouri
i agree. There are several good arguments for cremation, including that it is more efficient and usually less costly. If the family feels they have to have a 'place' to go to mourn they buy a mausoleum spot. But as mobile and scattered as many families are seems to me the options of one family member having 'custody' of them, scattering them or putting them in the hole before planting a tree or shrub if there's a family homestead likely to be in the family for at least 1 more generation make more sense to me than either burial in cemetery or storage of urn in mausoleum.Natural burials are a ways off simply because the numbers would create a health hazard with water run off, ground water etc especailly on a large scale. I will say the more traditional funeral burial is fading in numerous circles with cremation being a growing choice.
My estranged first husband, E. Indian from Guyana, S. America was killed 12/10/78 in Corpus Christi, TX. His youngest brother flew down from NYC to handle arrangements and my Sister who lived there assisted him. The body was flown 'home' and cremated on the beach as many Hindus in Guyana were (probably still are, the population is some 40 % E. Indian descent), tho of course usually just 1 at a time most years.Then there's the way the vast majority of Indians bury (cremate their dead)....
![]()
Horrendous for the environment of course.. ..and also many bodies are not even cremated but just dumped into the river Ganges... . People are so poor they can't afford traditional funerals.
The above picture was taken just 3 months ago during the height of the pandemic... every Pyre a different burning body