Paco Dennis
SF VIP
- Location
- Mid-Missouri
In what is a first in the history of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), 52 States and three international organisations, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the African Union (AU) and the Arab League, submitted written comments as well as oral presentations to a case.
The procedure concerns an advisory opinion requested from the ICJ in December 2022, before the current conflict, by the United Nations General Assembly on the “legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.”
“What are the legal consequences arising from the ongoing violation by Israel of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, from its prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and from its adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures?”
“How do the policies and practices of Israel affect the legal status of the occupation, and what are the legal consequences that arise for all States and the United Nations from this status?”
This recap provides a non-exhaustive overview of the points of view of the different speakers during the first three days of hearings (February 19-21). The remaining speakers will be presented after the hearings close on 26 February.
I am wondering which states/countries support Israel's actions?
Occupied Palestinian territories: first days of hearings at the ICJ
The procedure concerns an advisory opinion requested from the ICJ in December 2022, before the current conflict, by the United Nations General Assembly on the “legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.”
Questions asked by the UN General Assembly
The two specific questions posed by the UN General Assembly to the ICJ are as follows:“What are the legal consequences arising from the ongoing violation by Israel of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, from its prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and from its adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures?”
“How do the policies and practices of Israel affect the legal status of the occupation, and what are the legal consequences that arise for all States and the United Nations from this status?”
This recap provides a non-exhaustive overview of the points of view of the different speakers during the first three days of hearings (February 19-21). The remaining speakers will be presented after the hearings close on 26 February.
I am wondering which states/countries support Israel's actions?
Occupied Palestinian territories: first days of hearings at the ICJ