OK then...Why is American "democratic" human rights/individualism opposed to restricted behavior, when it is everywhere?

[feywon]

People who reject all types of coercion are known as anarchists. Anarchy would be a pretty inefficient and chaotic form of society since everyone would just be doing whatever the hell they wanted. There'd be thefts, murders, rapes, pillaging, plundering... And excessive littering!

I agree, i've had some in depth discussions with young 'anarchists' they seem to think some utopian existence would blossom in absence of goverment and other social structures. Yet they can never seem able to explain how such a society would function, how crucial infrastructure would even be maintained.