This old conspiracy theory was dug up again. Not there isn't some smoke here but I guess with little Bush running for president perhaps that why. The author Roger Stone was/is a Trump advocate.
http://myinforms.com/en-us/a/229509...-hw-bush-behind-reagan-assassination-attempt/
I remember the shooting and with a generation that experienced the JFK Assasinations, MLK and the hearings in the 1970s there was good reason to at least think about it. The crux of the theory is that the Bush's knew the Hinckleys with Neil Bush even having a scheduled dinner with them that night. Bush wanted a different foreign policy that would lead to 'a new world order'. The author claims a second shooter was present.
Numerous sites say Bush exploited the Hinckley's son.
One thing that many of these assassinations have in common is that the lone gunmen knew their target's itinerary down to the smallest detail, goes a little beyond at the first opportunity.
Again there is some smoke here but are they vapors or from a fire?
http://myinforms.com/en-us/a/229509...-hw-bush-behind-reagan-assassination-attempt/
I remember the shooting and with a generation that experienced the JFK Assasinations, MLK and the hearings in the 1970s there was good reason to at least think about it. The crux of the theory is that the Bush's knew the Hinckleys with Neil Bush even having a scheduled dinner with them that night. Bush wanted a different foreign policy that would lead to 'a new world order'. The author claims a second shooter was present.
Numerous sites say Bush exploited the Hinckley's son.
One thing that many of these assassinations have in common is that the lone gunmen knew their target's itinerary down to the smallest detail, goes a little beyond at the first opportunity.
Again there is some smoke here but are they vapors or from a fire?