Murrmurr
SF VIP
- Location
- Sacramento, California
No. It was debated by agencies and scientists and the public.Where was that "debate?" Fox News?
No. It was debated by agencies and scientists and the public.Where was that "debate?" Fox News?
(Actually, I made more of that than there was. There were some extremists, sure, but normal people knew there was no dilemma there.)... However, the narrative that we had to choose between "us or the fish" was a false dilemma.
As a result of many months of debate. I remember wishing I could go with the dive teams that studied some of the proposed farm sites. Beautiful places.Offshore wind farms undergo strict environmental reviews to minimize disruption during construction, and once they are built, they frequently become thriving underwater habitats.
Think Tanks & Policy InstitutesNo. It was debated by agencies and scientists and the public.
Wait. So the issue was debated??We do have is documentation that the admin sued to stop these 2 or 3 offshore wind projects because of "national security", .gov prevailed initially but in the end higher courts allowed the companies to start the wind farms, since they were already fully reviewed and permitted. So failing to stop the projects in court forced .gov to buy the companies out at the cost of 2 BILLION USD which will be added to the national debt.
Paco can you hear me???
We do have is documentation that the admin sued to stop these 2 or 3 offshore wind projects because of "national security", .gov prevailed initially but in the end higher courts allowed the companies to start the wind farms, since they were already fully reviewed and permitted. So failing to stop the projects in court forced .gov to buy the companies out at the cost of 2 BILLION USD which will be added to the national debt.
Paco can you hear me???
Loud and clear! I just hope that $2 billion includes a senior discount for the rest of us. At this rate, the national debt is the only thing growing faster than the weeds on my back 40.Holy chit, I'm stuck down the rabbit hole w @Paco Dennis. Somebody throw me line please!!!
The new "phase" of the war, "Project Freedom" is now focused on regaining control from Iran over the strait of Hormuz.
How could anyone accidentally watch Sky News? That's like accidentally steering your car into a guardrail.This caught my attention this evening when I accidentally ended up watching Sky News in the UK. I ended up with a quizzical look on my face, a little disbelieving.
Essentially, they seemed to be trying to reframe the war effort. They were trying to make it only about the Strait, and since the Strait is international waters, then the UN needs to get involved. BUT - do they really think we're going to forget that the reason there is an issue in the Strait is because of the Iran war?!?! You can't separate the two. Before the war started, the Strait was open.
Honestly, this is lame political maneuvering that is completely transparent. I hope the UN stays well out of it.
How could anyone accidentally watch Sky News? That's like accidentally steering your car into a guardrail.
In all seriousness, I get it. I will sometimes turn on the TV and whatever is on will play. Lucky for me, it's a local channel and it's the Kelly Clarkson show. Completely inoffensive, unlike Sky News.
Trump said the war is over, but he's waiting for confirmation from Iran.
Oh wait news is the Saudi's put the kibosh on escorting ships, "Project Freedom", through the SoH, which was then "paused." That's 3 minor powers Israel, Iran, and the Saudi's that control the outcome.