Qft.
An interesting op-ed piece and thanks for posting. It does make you think. Are we safer today than we were before 9-11? I suppose so, but as the auther points out, none of our efforts to squash terror and build new states in our image has worked. I don't know what the right answer is either, but it seems that we have engendered more hate and distrust towards us by the Muslim community as a result of our actions, while at the same time suppressing freedoms here at home. It's a scary time we live in and I really worry for the world my grandkids are growing up into. I'm not sure we can ever eliminate the extremist, radicalized Muslim way of thinking as long as continue down the same path. I don't have any answers, but it sure seems that the present course isn't working.
I have no doubt it was clearly flawed. We vilified and attacked sovereign countries that had done nothing to us.
I do have to say at this point ISIS is a small threat to the U.S. so we can't let them be.
Looks like we need more info. about them. Believe it or not.
We have been making mistakes in our attack.
I guess from reading that article that our choice, and France's too, and all the people from the middle east, is to sit down and just accept the life the extremist of our territories insist on. Never once should we resist and fight for our ways of thinking.
How ridiculous that idea is as that means most of these countries around the world, including US, Russis, China, France, and many others would not exist in the first place. It is not wrong for people to defend their ways from radical intruders from where ever they come from.
Has it ever occurred to any of you that when you announce your 'war on ________' it's going to fail? Does the pronouncement guarantee that? The war on terror, the war on drugs, the war on poverty, the war on illiteracy......
I was talking to a bozo on FB about all of this and he said something like 'places like Afghanistan and Iraq have resources that we need and if we don't go in there and take them, somebody else will'. Right there is the problem, the idea that 'we' have any right to TAKE anything and therefore WE are justified in whatever WE do. We take resources, we take out governments (to replace them), we, we, we......how would WE feel if somebody did that to us?
No one is saying that we can't defend ourselves, but when we go into another country and start meddling and taking and manipulating, then WE are asking for trouble. We need to do as Russia has said repeatedly over the last two or three years and that is start respecting others, other countries borders and do business with respect and consideration for other countries sovereignty.
I am just trying to figure this out -- so when you just put "qft" after a post (somebody on here said it meant "quoted for truth"), does that mean the same as saying you agree? I just hadn't seen the qft thing before lately and am trying to be sure I get what it means.
Thanks.
Has it ever occurred to any of you that when you announce your 'war on ________' it's going to fail? Does the pronouncement guarantee that? The war on terror, the war on drugs, the war on poverty, the war on illiteracy......
I was talking to a bozo on FB about all of this and he said something like 'places like Afghanistan and Iraq have resources that we need and if we don't go in there and take them, somebody else will'.
Right there is the problem, the idea that 'we' have any right to TAKE anything and therefore WE are justified in whatever WE do. We take resources, we take out governments (to replace them), we, we, we......how would WE feel if somebody did that to us?
No one is saying that we can't defend ourselves, but when we go into another country and start meddling and taking and manipulating, then WE are asking for trouble.
YepOops, machine ate my last line. It should have read, even this compassionate warrior remains hopeful, we are a resilient and resourceful young species.