Haha ...keeping posting it MY......What a joke this man is ...you posted that already MH ,Post 57...
Yes , I heard that mike.......the establishment will deny it.....grrrrrThe serving of the subpoena is being denied by
the people who are in the house, it was reported
on the BBC News today on the radio.
Mike.
Oh the irony of that term, "served." It's used in race horse breeding, when the stallion covers the mare, he services her. Likewise in the canine world, pedigree breeders and especially race dogs like whippets & greyhounds, when bred, are serviced. Then again we all knew that Andrew was a randy old stud.OK, Andrew has been served as of today.
But has he?
This is a great question fuzzbudy, if Prince Charles dies beforeThe Queen is, beloved, and in her 90s. Her long reign gave her a huge popularity, but it also means that her successors are going to be all old men. Men don't wear tiaras in public, so an old man doesn't look terribly "royal'. Given that the 'royals' are actual human beings, with all their human foibles, I wonder if the monarchy will continue without the mega star, QEII?
This is typical of the inaccurate information being passed around.he wasn't served with the papers.. a security chief, at Windsor Castle accepted the papers...
I said it was a security Chief.... and it'll all clearer still that it would be at Windsor lodge given that's where Andrew and Sarah now live...This is typical of the inaccurate information being passed around.
It was a security chief, it was a simple cop, and it wasn't Windsor Castle, it was Windsor Lodge.
OK, Andrew has been served as of today.
But has he?
You know you own law best, but I can't see that handing papers to somebody who happens to be standing at the front gate constitutes proper service.
Surely there is a requirement to show that the person is an authorised, or at least a legally recognized, representative of the defendant?
I agree, particularly as she was a paid escort..and oddly never tried to sue any of her other clients...With night of the British nor the US police intending to take action it is just down to this one woman who has alleged sexual assault.
She is perfectly entitled to do so of course, but I don't see much of a chances of her getting satisfaction.
Do you think they paid her off at all?I agree, particularly as she was a paid escort..and oddly never tried to sue any of her other clients...
Don't get me wrong..I have no love for PA..in fact he's such an arrogant piece of stuff, I'd love to see him being taken down a peg or 3 ..but I don't think this woman is going to be the one to do it...
No...never. She's still trying to sue him... it's the police in the UK who are saying there's no case to answer...Do you think they paid her off at all?
That seems to be the way things get handled these days.
That's because the Metro police see through the entire scheme. I think my country should take a lesson from this as well. After all she's living in Australia now and it is difficult to determine where all this is going except it should go out the window.No...never. She's still trying to sue him... it's the police in the UK who are saying there's no case to answer...
well it won't get to any court because the British Police have abandoned any and all investigations into this... so unless PA takes a trip to the USA.. and is served there, this is never likely to even sniff the inside of a court much less be a trialThis will be dragged out in courts and public to the point most won't care anymore. Others involved will probably started "dying" off or get nailed for something else. Others going scott free.