Prince Harry won't allow selfies with people! Should he?

Ralphy1

Ralphy1

Well-known Member
It seems to me that he is being a jerk by not allowing common people to have something to show friends and relatives and, perhaps, children and grandchildren. It is a like a famous person's autograph in the past. I certainly would and surely you would, too...
 

Hmm, well I have never denied anyone an autograph or a selfie. Time for them to loosen up. Maybe when Charles and Camilla take over...
 

Ralphy1 said:
Hmm, well I have never denied anyone an autograph or a selfie. Time for them to loosen up. Maybe when Charles and Camilla take over...
Click to expand...

When Charles takes over it will get worse! He's not very popular anyway. He's sticking his nose into politics and the royals are supposed to keep their mouths shut about that. He is far too snooty to loosen up. Now if they skipped him and had Wills who is down to earth.....
 
No, no, she would want one with me, especially when I am sporting my manties!
 
I understand though that she's been becoming more popular in Britain.. No longer has the "other woman" stigma. BUT... she always will as far as I'm concerned.
 
QuickSilver said:
I understand though that she's been becoming more popular in Britain.. No longer has the "other woman" stigma. BUT... she always will as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...

Don't know who she is popular with. I know it's agreed that the monarchy will lose its popularity when Charles is King.

From what I've heard and read the majority of Scots are most definitely not royalists. Most of our postboxes still say GR for King George, instead of ERII because the Queen is not Scotland's second Queen Elizabeth but the first as the countries were not united during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. When they tried to put ERII on the postboxes here, Scots objected so they stopped.

One down my road:

postbox.jpg
 
QuickSilver said:
Yeah... and one has to wonder with WHAT position. lol!!
Click to expand...

Apparently every position. I don't want to get detailed, but do you remember the story back when his phone was tapped and he was heard telling Camilla about a product he wished he was, because..... well, it's gross.
 
I had a crush on Prince Charles when I was a kid, because we are the same age. I thought I would one day go to England and he would marry me and I would be the queen... lol!!
 
QuickSilver said:
I had a crush on Prince Charles when I was a kid, because we are the same age. I thought I would one day go to England and he would marry me and I would be the queen... lol!!
Click to expand...

LOL. You fancy the ears? He is one week older than my DH so I tell him they are the prince and the pauper. He hates that. I can't type the names he calls Charles.

I've never heard a snootier sounding posh English accent.
 
Ralphy1 said:
Who are we to judge true love as expressed by Chuck...
Click to expand...

Yes, and he should have married her when they were both young. He wouldn't so she married somebody else. She encouraged him to marry Diana and poor Diana (no, she wasn't a saint) had no idea what she was getting into.
 
Bee said:
Diana was no innocent with her affairs.
Click to expand...

No, she wasn't innocent. She was naive and in love and a girl of 19. I can overlook her bad behaviour because she went through hell with Charles and she felt trapped. Yes, she had affairs but so did he. And she did a lot of good things once she was on her own.
 
Ameriscot said:
No, she wasn't innocent. She was naive and in love and a girl of 19. I can overlook her bad behaviour because she went through hell with Charles and she felt trapped. Yes, she had affairs but so did he. And she did a lot of good things once she was on her own.
Click to expand...

I'm also in the "Diana was used to produce an heir and a spare" camp.. while Charles carried on his long time love affair with that horse. Too bad his wish about becoming her tampon didn't come true and it smothered him... Wills will make a much more respectable King.
 
QuickSilver said:
I'm also in the "Diana was used to produce an heir and a spare" camp.. while Charles carried on his long time love affair with that horse. Too bad his wish about becoming her tampon didn't come true and it smothered him... Wills will make a much more respectable King.
Click to expand...

Yes, she was. Royal brides had to be proven to be virgins back then, but that rule has wisely been rescinded. I always 'neigh' when I see Camilla on tv. LOL. Smothered by a tampon! OMG. LOL.

Yes, Wills and Kate seem to be sincerely down to earth. I like them.
 
Ameriscot said:
Yes, she was. Royal brides had to be proven to be virgins back then, but that rule has wisely been rescinded. I always 'neigh' when I see Camilla on tv. LOL. Smothered by a tampon! OMG. LOL.

Yes, Wills and Kate seem to be sincerely down to earth. I like them.
Click to expand...

Don't you remember the tape of Charles talking to Camilla on the phone?

http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2005/apr/10/foodanddrink.monarchy

The main problem for Charles, though, was that, in making this apology, he did nothing but help us recall the behaviour for which he was saying sorry. While he was admitting that the 'remembrance of them is grievous upon us', all many of us out here could think about was that phone conversation in which he announced that he wished he was Camilla's tampon. A grievous memory? I doubt it. Excruciatingly embarrassing? Undoubtedly.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top