Stormy Does Starry, Part I, and it's sequel Starry Does Stormy, Part IIDidn't Starry Decisis make some films with Stormy Daniels?![]()
Stormy Does Starry, Part I, and it's sequel Starry Does Stormy, Part IIDidn't Starry Decisis make some films with Stormy Daniels?![]()
From the ACLU article:This is not an opinion, just a report from ACLU:
From June, 2024, Louisiana and the Ten Commandments
I don’t believe religion has any need to be taught in school. School is meant for education purposes ONLY. The only place I believe religion should be taught is in church and Sunday school. It doesn’t belong anywhere else.
In High School, not before. IMOI think learning ABOUT religions (note: plural) is important - not promoting any one of them and not proselytising.
Learning about different religions is completely different than being taught one religion mandatorily and promoting it.I think learning ABOUT religions (note: plural) is important - not promoting any one of them and not proselytising.
In High School, not before. IMO
This may help explain. It also cites USSC decisions that, if followed, may permit display of the Commandments, which is tricky.From the ACLU article:
"Schools may also display the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence and the Northwest Ordinance under the new law."
I wonder why they didn't include the Bill of Rights.![]()
Some states will undoubtedly pass laws preventing public school displays or teaching of the Commandments.This may help explain. It also cites USSC decisions that, if followed, may permit display of the Commandments, which is tricky.
Plural
Some states will undoubtedly pass laws preventing public school displays or teaching of the Commandments.
There's already a law against mandating religious practice. It's called the 1st Amendment to our Constitution.Some states will undoubtedly pass laws preventing public school displays or teaching of the Commandments.
I understand that. I was responding to the possible loophole linked in @ohioboy's post.There's already a law against mandating religious practice. It's called the 1st Amendment to our Constitution.
True, and our considering the radical nature of our current SCOTUS, they'll probably allow it through some convoluted reasoning.I understand that. I was responding to the possible loophole linked in @ohioboy's post.
If it looks like that provides wiggle-room, some states are apt to close the loophole with specific laws.
Exactly right. And that's the way it should be.I'd imagine that might be decided state by state.
I don't know. There is an awful lot of deliberate, harmful indoctrination going on there already. Why the outrage on this single point?No. No. And no again. No appropriate for school. Teach kids what they need to know. No control what is rammed down their throats in the household, but don't do it in schools.