Interesting study released about mass shootings. In the last 52 years of recorded shootings...each and every single case-the person doing the shooting was on anti psychotic drugs, depression drugs, anti anxiety meds, or other drugs.
They try to say 'oh its only 23 percent of them on depression, anxiety etc, drugs'. But they neglect to say that the other drugs they are on have massive side effects, such as negative effects that can cause suicidal or homicidal thoughts. Why is this not talked about?
Also, there are more shootings in -anti gun/no gun- cities per weekend than all mass shootings per year.
Again, why the focus on mass shooting gun crimes, but not on all gun crimes?
Why do cities with no guns allowed, gun bans, or extremely strict gun laws have the most shootings?
Example, cook country Illinois which Chicago is in...had 929 shootings. One city-Chicago has more gun crimes in a -no gun city-, than 10 years of all US mass shootings. Why are we not talking about Chicago gun crimes? Or other -no gun city- crimes?
I find with almost everything, people pick and choose their ground to stand on, or what to fight/stand up for, instead of discussing the entire problem. And usually is just a small fraction of a bigger problem.