Sex Without Love, is a Meaningless Experience

An 80-year-old lady because she had just gotten married for the fourth time.
Previously she had first married a banker when she was in her 20's.
Then, in her 40's, she married a circus ringmaster.
On reaching her 60's she had married a preacher.
Her new husband's occupation is that of a funeral director.

So when the local journalist who was running the story and seemed quite surprised,
commented on the diversity of her husband's careers she simply explained:
"I married one for the money, two for the show, three to get ready, and four to go."
 
If it produces a child, (only one time is necessary), it will be far from “meaningless”. I will mean 18 years minimum of bills, loss of free time, hassles galore, and other obligations.

My sister’s cousin-in-law had a fling with a younger gal, when he was in his early 50s. When most of us were celebrating our children reaching the age of majority and the new freedom to do things without having to take responsibility for the kids, he was dealing with a middle schooler. And all the hassles of being divorced without ever getting divorced.
 
Nothing wrong with a little good clean sex, just keep it to yourselves. 😉🤭😂
murder-she-wrote-angela-lansbury.gif
 
I don't think you're saying that sex without love isn't fun, because you would have said that.
Also for two people to engage in sex, it obviously means they are physically attracted to each other (So it has meaning).
If however you are saying that it doesn't have the same emotional experience as sex when you are in love, then I think that's a fair statement.
Sex is one body having a physical experience with another body.
Sex when you are truly in love is a body and soul having a physical experience with another.
 
Back
Top