Should We Use An Atom Bomb Against Isil?

Man, reliving my acid days is looking almost compulsory---agggggh! If this is the reality train, I wanna get off! Lolololol.
I agree, "Conductor stop at the next bar please!"

ATTENTION: DO NOT TAKE THE BROWN ACID

tumblr_mywfhkINgy1srpgaxo1_500.gif
 

Boozer, it is heartening to know, that apparently, Canada and Scotland are not on the terrorist's nuke list. Annie and I will sleep safely in our beds tonight!:rolleyes:
 

Shalimar said:
Boozer, it is heartening to know, that apparently, Canada and Scotland are not on the terrorist's nuke list. Annie and I will sleep safely in our beds tonight!:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Yes Shally, it certainly is heartening to know that you and Annie will sleep safely in your beds tonight.
All I can say is...

images


It's for you both.

And...

sample_sweetdream.gif


to the both of you as well!

See Ladies.
Even though you have been 'orrible to me here, I have no hard feeling against you! :cool:




snickering.gif
 
boozercruiser said:
This subject is just going to be discussed on the British Jeremy Vine show on BBC Radio 2 now at 12.05PM.
I have yet to listen to the discussion yet, but my immediate reaction is YES we should drop an Atom Bomb on them.

Before they blow us to Kingdom Hell first!
icon_twisted.gif


After all doing just that brought to the end of World War 2.
We dropped atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and no doubt that killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people.

But it DID end the war!

And how many British and American lives were saved by doing that?
A rough guess will be a another few hundred thousand or even millions of Us.
Click to expand...

I'm thinking that would spell A-R-M-A-G-E-D-D-O-N.....
 
We live directly under the Newark Airport landing zone. So if anyone blows up on takeoff or landing...well sucks to be us. Too worried about stray bullets from drive-bys for it to matter anyways
 
Shalimar said:
Boozer, it is heartening to know, that apparently, Canada and Scotland are not on the terrorist's nuke list. Annie and I will sleep safely in our beds tonight!:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Assembling an "improvised" bomb is relatively easy. So is delivering it. Assembling a nuclear bomb is an entirely different deal. Firstly, only recognized "governments" possess the fissionable materials needed, let alone the conventional explosives necessary, as well as the ability to construct successful "explosive lenses" needed to "assemble" the fissionables in such a way that they actually work.

As far as I'm concerned, and someone may pose a counter-thought here, IF the various terrorist factions had been hitherto able to do so, a nuclear attack would have by now been carried out. Now, if a terrorist government, having all those pre-requisites available, saw fit to deliver, that's another story. Possibly the Iran story, but somehow I don't think so. If such an act, traceable to any country's government, were to occur, the elimination of that country's government, would be assured. They are not complete fools; they know that. Better to kill dozens or hundreds conventionally, than assure going to meet Allah, the other way. imp
 
I don't think nuking ISIS would work although they certainly deserve it. I wish allied forces could somehow drug their water supply with heavy duty barbiturates. When they all fall asleep, walk in and peacefully disarm them. No collateral damage or innocents slaughtered. Just the crazies.

Of course we'd need ground forces to make this work and many don't want that. :eek:nthego:
 
imp said:
Assembling an "improvised" bomb is relatively easy. So is delivering it. Assembling a nuclear bomb is an entirely different deal. Firstly, only recognized "governments" possess the fissionable materials needed, let alone the conventional explosives necessary, as well as the ability to construct successful "explosive lenses" needed to "assemble" the fissionables in such a way that they actually work.

As far as I'm concerned, and someone may pose a counter-thought here, IF the various terrorist factions had been hitherto able to do so, a nuclear attack would have by now been carried out. Now, if a terrorist government, having all those pre-requisites available, saw fit to deliver, that's another story. Possibly the Iran story, but somehow I don't think so. If such an act, traceable to any country's government, were to occur, the elimination of that country's government, would be assured. They are not complete fools; they know that. Better to kill dozens or hundreds conventionally, than assure going to meet Allah, the other way. imp
Click to expand...

That's exactly right... North Korea has the bomb... and they rattle their sabers and shake their fists at us... but even though their leader is crazy.. he keeps it at that... Anyone think North Korea hates us less than Iran.. ??
 
If we all want naked rathe than thinking nuked it might help, but getting a little too cold for that for many...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top