hollydolly
SF VIP
- Location
- London England
Bobby Fischer 1970's...

Just from a news story I read about 30 min ago on AP, it appears that he *did* complete the semester, and that his father had flown into WA from PA to drive back with him, cross country.I had been feeling that either the police were either inept or they were keeping pertinent information from the public. Glad to see it was the latter. But I still find it strange that the other occupants of the house were not harmed @Lewkat and now, why he asked if they arrested anyone else. The police chief sounded confident when reporting that he acted alone. I also wonder if his parents suspected he was the killer because he showed up at their home, probably shortly after the murders and I don't think the semester was over yet. He probably made some excuse as to why he was visiting for so long.
@SeniorBen I thought his face looked familiar; now I know why.
@WhatInThe Yeah, I saw a news report that said he's not fighting extradition because his lawyer wants him back so he can prove he's innocent and be exonerated.
Oh okay. Thank you. I hadn't seen that. Yes, pieces of the story are coming in bit by bit.Just from a news story I read about 30 min ago on AP, it appears that he *did* complete the semester, and that his father had flown into WA from PA to drive back with him, cross country.
We're just going to have to wait for a while, seems like.
That's really the only thing that makes sense, I guess. Maybe it will all come out when he gets back to Idaho and they're allowed to release some of the information that's locked now.They were all drunk & sleeping it off?
That was my thought, too.I saw that too. Makes one wonder because for one person to take out 4 with minimal struggle. Some witness ex residents etc say you can hear what goes on. But if the accomplishes had to subdue the victims wouldn't they leave bruises, marks discoverable in the autopsies?
What was the suspect's business in Pennsylvania again?
Good questions!!The most trouble I'm having with this story is how one person alone could commit this horrible crime without anyone making sounds or alerting others. Some of the students had defensive wounds and fought back... so why weren't they screaming and alerting others? And two of them were a couple so I guess we can assume they were in the same bed... how could one person kill both of them plus two other people close-by without any sound or alerting? It's just bizarre and I sincerely hope justice is served.
What are the laws in the USA about suspects and the media? It seems this guy has already been decided as the culprit before he has even gone to trial?
What's going on here (US popular opinion), I think, is that the victims seemed to be young, full of life, and enjoying living, and in a single hour were extinguished like candleflames.What are the laws in the USA about suspects and the media? It seems this guy has already been decided as the culprit before he has even gone to trial? I hope it is him and they haven't just arrested the "oddball" because he seems, well, odd.
This idea of being in a near-drugged slumber takes a bit more thought...That's really the only thing that makes sense, I guess. Maybe it will all come out when he gets back to Idaho and they're allowed to release some of the information that's locked now.
Just because someone "has 'the right'" to do something does not always mean it "is right" to do it.Media have a right under our 1st Amendment to cover any arrest made in a public place.
I agree, but no longer expect society in general to comprehend this.Just because someone "has 'the right'" to do something does not always mean it "is right" to do it.
Unfortunately that's too often true.I agree, but no longer expect society in general to comprehend this.
Screwing with the free press is the worst thing that can happen, IMOJust because someone "has 'the right'" to do something does not always mean it "is right" to do it.
I agree, but that horse has been out of the gate for a long time...Just because someone "has 'the right'" to do something does not always mean it "is right" to do it.
Absolutely! And expecting discretion in releasing a popular story just isn't realistic today. Too many news outlets, too much competition to expect that.Screwing with the free press is the worst thing that can happen, IMO
Hah!Unfortunately that's too often true.
It is what's happening now, with a vengeance.Screwing with the free press is the worst thing that can happen, IMO
Yep.I agree, but that horse has been out of the gate for a long time...
Absolutely! And expecting discretion in releasing a popular story just isn't realistic today. Too many news outlets, too much competition to expect that.
You are right of course, however I don't see a way to control that... When I see a lot of it in a media outlet I try to avoid the outlet all together, that may be our only real means of limiting it.they should not have the right to present errors, leave out relevant information, etc.
Yes it has. However we have a long history of this kind of thing. 100+ years ago it was called yellow journalism. Some of the things newspapers printed in the 1800s were awful, even by today's standards.News has become part of the "circuses" part of the ol' "bread and circuses" thingie...