When I attended church for a few years with my wife, I heard all manner of swearing. They thinly disguised it as "flippin", "floppin", friggin", freakin", etc., but we all knew what it was (but nobody was allowed to say so), with the same first letter, syllables and same flow and usage in a sentence as the so-called "F-bomb". These are known as "minced oaths", designed to make swearing somehow socially acceptable.
It reminds me of attending the afternoon coffee in our association community room years ago when the first group of folks lived there, the previous generation right before mine. They would frequently talk about so-called "dirty" subjects by talking around them in such a way as to make it obvious what they were talking and giggling about, but if anyone actually said what it was, that was grounds for being asked to leave.
So this kind of thing has been going on for quite some time. The difference is that the thin, socially acceptable, disguise has been removed to be what it really is. Whether that is a good or bad thing depends on individual judgement, I am simply pointing out that it is nothing new. To me, it all seems a bit hypocritical. If we shouldn't say such things, why approach them at all, thinly disguised or not?
Tony