Denise1952
Well-known Member
Even if the Grand Jury were to indict, that does not mean the officer is guilty of what is contained in that indictment. It only means there was evidence enough to send it to trial. If the indictment does come down, the resulting jury trial will garner just as much demonstrating and angst as we've seen already.
Every American does have the right to peaceful protest. We do NOT have the right to loot, steal, torch, and assault. So, why all the "noise"??
Was the officer justified in shooting the young man? If the young man was attempting to wrest the officer's firearm from him... yes. Was the officer justified in putting seven slugs into the young man? That might be debatable. Once the perp is disabled, there is no reason to continue firing.
Were the citizens of the community justified in looting and stealing from local businesses as a result of the incident? Postively NOT!!
Was the local police force somewhat at fault when they arrived in armored military vehicles with assault rifles pointed at the crowd? IMHO, extremley poor judgement on behalf of the local police and that poor judgement led to some of the demonstrations turning into riots.
Plenty of issues in this case. Lots of outsiders encouraging the citizens to rise up against the police and the justice system. That 'cheerleading' does not assist in the making of good decisions. Media is in the middle of this thing and keeping it top/center in the news cycle. That also doesn't help. The more publicity, the more some of the agitators will be encouraged. Would be nice if cool heads prevailed. I don't know that there are cool heads on either side of this issue.
I agree with your statement, and it is well said imo. And this isn't about you GOM, but the thought came to me on how people of the US gripe when the CDC doesn't "move fast enough", and we gripe when FEMA didn't show up fast enough. Now we have someone show up at the first signs of trouble, and we gripe. I'm confused.