The Queen has stripped prince Andrew of his title and military titles, and all his patronages..

Farting Fergie & Randy Andy, what an embarrassment to our country.
Is the defrocked (former) Prince Andrew worried? Of course not, he isn't sweating at all.

I have no doubt Prince Andrew will walk away from all of the accusations alleged toward
him without any consequences! No sweat
 
Last edited:
Tish said:
Now if only she would strip Haz and his wife of their titles, or at least remove them from the Royal Family page.
Click to expand...

Yep. Harry--if he can do wise for once and I doubt it--had better take note. His brother will be King someday and I doubt will ever forgive him for selling out the family ...especially cashing in on their mother's death.
 

terry123 said:
Strange but I read that he had done it himself and the Queen accepted it. Don't know which is right.
Click to expand...
yes who knows what's right and what's not... except for the fact he is no longer HRH.. or has money coming in from his titles and patronages... I feel tho' that given that he's refused to go in front of a judge , because he's ''innocent''.. why then would he be the one to choose to remove himself essentially as a royal.. and a royal who was working on behalf of the firm and being handsomely paid for it ?... I can't imagine it was his choice...
 
I doubt it as it is my understanding the girl was of consensual age in the UK where the deed allegedly took place. Probably will all be settled out of court anyhow.
 
terry123 said:
Strange but I read that he had done it himself and the Queen accepted it. Don't know which is right.
Click to expand...
Yes, @terry123 -

"On 20 November 2019, a statement from Buckingham Palace announced that Prince Andrew was suspending his public duties "for the foreseeable future". The decision, made with the consent of the Queen, was accompanied by insistence that the Duke sympathised with Epstein's victims.[1"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Andrew_&_the_Epstein_Scandal#Background
 
hollydolly said:
Can you imagine at the ripe old age of almost 96 years old having to deal with a 61 year old son, and strip him of everything .. including his dignity.. how difficult that must have been knowing that her son will go down in history with a Big Black mark over his head forever...
Click to expand...
The trial is not until October so her Jubilee celebration will be overshadowed by all the unseemly details that come out during pretrial events. Her favorite brought it all on on the Royal Family.

This could all have been avoided if the high priced British lawyers and PR specialists had impressed upon Andrew and the Queen to settle a long time ago. Should have nipped it in the bud.
 
Nosy Bee-54 said:
The trial is not until October so her Jubilee celebration will be overshadowed by all the unseemly details that come out during pretrial events. Her favorite brought it all on on the Royal Family.

This could all have been avoided if the high priced British lawyers and PR specialists had impressed upon Andrew and the Queen to settle a long time ago. Should have nipped it in the bud.
Click to expand...
Couldn't agree more...
 
It sounds like an attempt to make Andrew judgment proof and limit the amount of any financial settlement.

I was reading that Andrew's Swiss chalet valued at an estimated Ā£17m pounds is currently for sale.

I'm sure that money will disappear in a complicated game of smoke and mirrors before any settlement is reached.

The only person I feel bad for in all of this is the Queen.

IMO all of the people involved including Ms. Giuffre knew what a sick and dangerous game they were involved in from the start.
 
Last edited:
Aunt Bea said:
It sounds like an attempt to make Andrew judgment proof and limit the amount of any financial settlement.

I was reading that Andrew's Swiss chalet valued at an estimated Ā£17m pounds is currently for sale.

I'm sure that money will disappear in a complicated game of smoke & mirrors before any settlement is reached.

The only person I feel bad for in all of this is the Queen.

IMO all of the people involved including Ms. Giuffre knew what a sick and dangerous game they were involved in from the start.
Click to expand...
see this is another slimeball thing. he bought that Chalet from a socialite friend. back in 2014.. and agreed to pay in instalments ( both he and Sarah).. but they never paid the final 5 million... and then only last week he agreed to pay the friend her money finally.. but only so he can put the chalet on the market for Ā£18 million.... what a sleazeball ...
 
Last edited:
hollydolly said:
see this is another slimeball thing. he bought that Chalet from a soialite friend. back in 2014.. and agreed to pay in installments ( both he and Sarah).. but they never paid the final 5 million... and then only last week he agreed to pay the friend her money finally.. but only so he can put the chalet on the market for Ā£18 million.... what a sleazeball ...
Click to expand...
Speaking of slimy dealings:

"In the end, she [Sarah Ferguson] managed to avoid bankruptcy, in part because of the $19,000 bail-out from Epstein, made after he had served time for sexual offences against a minor."

https://www.newsweek.com/sarah-fergusons-money-troubles-prince-andrews-jeffrey-epstein-1473562
 
Lewkat said:
I doubt it as it is my understanding the girl was of consensual age in the UK where the deed allegedly took place. Probably will all be settled out of court anyhow.
Click to expand...
No, the complaint states the sexual abuse took place in New York and was filed under New York's Long Arm Statute. We have all heard of the Long Arm of the law metaphor.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top