Debby
Well-known Member
- Location
- East coast of Canada
Did I miss something, because I did not notice where any of the experts you cited mentioned anything specifically about the the coyote problem in Georgia or the hog problem in Texas? Both of those states have educated, professional, and dedicated folks involved in this who care greatly about their natural resources. They have taken unusual and controversial measures in what appears to me as a sign of desperation for a problem they haven't been able to get a handle on. I hope they got it right but both measures obviously have some serious risks. I'm confident they have used due diligence in all this, but that's not to say things can't go sideways or there isn't a better way. Both coyotes and wild hogs are cunning animals, can be dangerous, can reproduce in great numbers, and can devastate an area if left alone... I think everyone agrees with that.
You're right, the articles that I shared were about predator control in general, not specifically to do with any one state. And I would point out from the articles that this seems to be new thinking on the issue so it's not surprising that 'your' sources have a different and more traditional philosophy on the issue.
Twenty years ago, people thought the whole 'global warming/climate change' issue was bogus and yet this morning, I watched a video taken by a researcher who filmed a piece of Arctic ice fall off that was the size of 1/2 of Manhatten and the thickness of which was the equivalent of three of it's tallest skyscrapers stacked on top of each other. And we now have institutions beginning to change menu plans because they recognize the harm that animal agriculture is doing to the planet. So yeah, change always starts somewhere doesn't it?