Who Needs ISIS When Chicago Gangsters Shoot 9 Year Olds

W

WhatInThe

SF VIP
The Paris attacks and ISIS took the spotlight from this perverted assassination. But this horrific and sick revenge killing of a 9 year old boy to send a message to the father is just as bad as an ISIS attack. In both the terrorist and gang banger's mind the ends seem to justify the means.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...ter-who-gunned-down-a-chicago-9-year-old.html

And just like ISIS these domestic gang bangers seem to have no boundaries. Purposely killing innocent children-Really? I don't even think Al Capone who ruled Chicago ever killed a child to send a message as vile as he was. There seems to be no code. I don't who is worse the gang leader, the trigger man or those who stood by and did nothing.

I don't condone it but I understand if one voluntarily goes into the gangster life they must accept murder as part of 'the business'. A nine year cannot make that decision nor can other family members unassociated with gang business.

Who needs ISIS when you have perverse gang bangers in Chicago.
 

Who needs ISIS when you have perverse gang bangers in Chicago.
Click to expand...

Very True...and it's not only Chicago...but virtually Every major Urban area in the U.S. Every year, there are Hundreds of Blacks killed, and Thousands wounded, by the members of these drug and street gangs. The mayhem caused by these thugs exceeds anything ISIS could possibly bring to these shores. If the media reported on this activity with as much fervor as it is doing with this recent Paris attack, there would be nothing else on TV.
 
Not to mention the sick white boys going into schools and theaters and killing scores of people with assault weapons... but who's counting.
 

QuickSilver said:
Not to mention the sick white boys going into schools and theaters and killing scores of people with assault weapons... but who's counting.
Click to expand...

I believe the death counts of those 'sick white boys' would be a far lot less than what the gangs and drugs folks do all the time. No, I do not have the counts before me.
 
Yup, there is no "Racial" boundaries on Stupidity. However, on balance, Black on Black crime accounts for the majority of murders in the U.S....browse the data on the FBI, etc., web sites.
 
QuickSilver said:
Not to mention the sick white boys going into schools and theaters and killing scores of people with assault weapons... but who's counting.
Click to expand...

The sick theatre shooters tend to do their perverse acts as one time thing with many having the decency to take themselves out. Big city gangsters seem do it as part of the normal course of business without compunction. Over time their numbers can surpass the mass shooters. I'm more worried about the criminal on the street who has already shown the ability to kill without remorse. Even worse shown they have no problem assassinating a 9 year old. Many of these gangsters wether old Mafia enforcers or modern day gangsters are nothing but sociopathic serial killers.
 
Don M. said:
Yup, there is no "Racial" boundaries on Stupidity. However, on balance, Black on Black crime accounts for the majority of murders in the U.S....browse the data on the FBI, etc., web sites.
Click to expand...

I have no doubt about that Don... Poverty and hopelessness do create much of this... The thing to be said about black on black crime is that it's not random.... Most times it's about something... TURF.... GANG wars... Drug wars.... and knowing many cops... it is said that gang members are notoriously bad shots so they hit innocent people... The Mass shootings perpetrated by the white terrorists... is totally random.. with no purpose other than anger or whatever is in that mentally ill persons mind.. there is a difference.
 
WhatInThe said:
The sick theatre shooters tend to do their perverse acts as one time thing with many having the decency to take themselves out. Big city gangsters seem do it as part of the normal course of business without compunction. Over time their numbers can surpass the mass shooters. I'm more worried about the criminal on the street who has already shown the ability to kill without remorse. Even worse shown they have no problem assassinating a 9 year old. Many of these gangsters wether old Mafia enforcers or modern day gangsters are nothing but sociopathic serial killers.
Click to expand...

I'm not particularly fond of going to the theater or the mall.. or church and having by brains blown out either...
 
Question. Do you think anti black sentiment in America has risen since the election of a black president? Or has this vision of black/white violence just remained entrenched in the national consciousness?
 
I believe the election of our President had a lot to do with it. I don't think it increased it... just made it more acceptable to voice. It empowered the closet racists to come out of the closet.
 
Ewwwwwww. Sad. Amazing how even educated people twist obvious realities to fit with their skewed perspective. It seems to me that at this point, rich, white, protestant, and male are still the cultural gods in America? Oh, the cult of privilege. Let us all bow down.....
 
Shalimar said:
Ewwwwwww. Sad. Amazing how even educated people twist obvious realities to fit with their skewed perspective. It seems to me that at this point, rich, white, protestant, and male are still the cultural gods in America? Oh, the cult of privilege. Let us all bow down.....
Click to expand...

I don't think racist is in any more. The voting public keeps on electing blacks to government positions in our towns, cities, states, US government. What happens in our cities where the blacks turn to drugs and shootings in gang fights does not represent the masses that pretty much ignore color or heritage when they vote. I think most of us treat our neighbors openly and fairly. Nothing like what it was in the fifties when I was living in the southern states. Likely some still around, but not a general item like it was prior to the days of recognition and Martin Luther King.
 
Organized crime is America always was and still is...well...organized. The original Goodfella's were appalled with the drug trade. There was money to be made but you're talking about drugs. Bootlegging was another thing but they had their standards. Most of the old school Italian and Irish businessmen wanted nothing to do with selling drugs. And even standards for murder, you could blow up your enemy...but not women or children, what are you a frickin' animal? These gangs of kids now are a world removed.

Time for someone to pipe up that if the nine year old had been legally armed he could have saved himself
 
Shalimar said:
Question. Do you think anti black sentiment in America has risen since the election of a black president? Or has this vision of black/white violence just remained entrenched in the national consciousness?
Click to expand...

Reading through this entire thread, I found your question....and I feel compelled to answer. Has race relations in the US suffered during the Obama administration???....IMO, Yes. Consider this...Obama is Not Black...rather he is a Mulatto, which is only Half Black. As such, he has had a unique perspective to look at Both sides of the issue, and present a moderating viewpoint...But, he has Failed to do so. It appears that he reveres his Father, who abandoned him and his mother when he was only about 3 years old...while, at the same time giving little credit to his White mother (whose ancestors may have owned slaves) and White Grandparents..who were mostly responsible for raising him.

Obama's father....who he describes in glowing terms in his book, "Dreams from my Father", appears to have been lacking in many areas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama,_Sr.

Then, there is Obama's African ancestry...coming from the Luo tribes in Kenya....which were renowned for preying on the weaker tribes, and selling their captives to the Muslim...and eventually, the Dutch and British slave traders to bring to the Americas, and sell them to the highest bidder. There are any number of references on the Internet to this probability in Obama's ancestry. Wouldn't it paint a far different picture of Obama if it were possible to prove these allegations via Ancestry.com, etc.???

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-107575

Personally, I think Obama recognizes his ancestry ties to the Black slave trades, and he is going overboard to try to compensate for his tainted ancestry. His bias is fairly obvious, and is being noted by a lot of people....of Both races, and he has missed a Golden Opportunity to improve this situation, and only made the divisions wider.
 
For.... well.... for being black I guess.. No seriously... For being more violent.. more murderous... more prone to crime than Whites.. Isn't that what the inference was in the OP?
 
Shalimar said:
Gang violence has far less to with colour than it does with environment. Put purple people in the same situation, the results would be the same.
Click to expand...

You are right here. If all whites were raised in fatherless families, then they too would have children just like those in our big cities.

But my neighbors are blacks and they are the nicest people we have met in many years. We have a Granny that watches the house as her daughters are out working. Then she also takes care of other daughters kids and their children's children too. They are all very protective of their children and the children of each are very well behaved and obedient. They often do things for us, just plain old voluntary folks. Nice neighbors to have. So for me, those problems in the cities is not because of color at all. But if they do not take care of the children then, who will do that, and instill kind and proper thoughts to them while young and growing.

Child care does not come with living on welfare. That has to come from the mother and father because they believe in that responsibility.
 
QuickSilver said:
For.... well.... for being black I guess.. No seriously... For being more violent.. more murderous... more prone to crime than Whites.. Isn't that what the inference was in the OP?
Click to expand...

I had not read that in the original post, my wife and friends manufactured a pile of cookies and holiday treats- maybe I have sugar brain fog today. :shrug:
 
Don M. said:
Reading through this entire thread, I found your question....and I feel compelled to answer. Has race relations in the US suffered during the Obama administration???....IMO, Yes. Consider this...Obama is Not Black...rather he is a Mulatto, which is only Half Black. As such, he has had a unique perspective to look at Both sides of the issue, and present a moderating viewpoint...But, he has Failed to do so. It appears that he reveres his Father, who abandoned him and his mother when he was only about 3 years old...while, at the same time giving little credit to his White mother (whose ancestors may have owned slaves) and White Grandparents..who were mostly responsible for raising him.

Obama's father....who he describes in glowing terms in his book, "Dreams from my Father", appears to have been lacking in many areas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama,_Sr.

Then, there is Obama's African ancestry...coming from the Luo tribes in Kenya....which were renowned for preying on the weaker tribes, and selling their captives to the Muslim...and eventually, the Dutch and British slave traders to bring to the Americas, and sell them to the highest bidder. There are any number of references on the Internet to this probability in Obama's ancestry. Wouldn't it paint a far different picture of Obama if it were possible to prove these allegations via Ancestry.com, etc.???

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-107575

Personally, I think Obama recognizes his ancestry ties to the Black slave trades, and he is going overboard to try to compensate for his tainted ancestry. His bias is fairly obvious, and is being noted by a lot of people....of Both races, and he has missed a Golden Opportunity to improve this situation, and only made the divisions wider.
Click to expand...


I disagree with this....I think President Obama recognizes the unique position he is in as for his race and being the leader of this country, I think he strives to present a fair balance and to avoid conflict.
 
Jackie22 said:
I disagree with this....I think President Obama recognizes the unique position he is in as for his race and being the leader of this country, I think he strives to present a fair balance and to avoid conflict.
Click to expand...

I agree... I think he has tried to be a calming force.. He has tried to show Blacks by example that it's possible to be a success... and tried to show Whites that a Black man can be a great leader.... Unfortunately the many of later group doesn't seem to be able to get past the "color" part..

Where did anyone get the idea that because of his race, he could solve all the problems of racial tension in this country? Is it even fair to expect that of ONE man? Get real Don..
 
Also, I am very disturbed by the thought of "impure blood." Isn't that what "tainted ancestry" means? Shades of Nazi thinking. Who among us has pure non/tainted ancestry? All peoples have acts of cruelty and barbarism in their past. Sadly, some of us

perpetuate it in the present. This divisive approach only feeds racism. Forgive me, but to hear an individual from a country which practiced slavery sneer at President Obama's possible origins defies comprehension.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top