fmdog44
Well-known Member
- Location
- Houston, Texas
I never liked the idea of naming a son after the father by attaching a "Jr" to his name. To me, it says something is missing in the father.
The son had no choice in the name while the father thinks two of him is better.Ah. To me, it suggests that something is missing in the son — although that can't be true.
Beats heck outa being named from whatever the baby first saw at birth, like the native Americans did.I never liked the idea of naming a son after the father
Got to agree with that Gary. This link will give you a list of You-Kneek, (someone thought it clever, unique even,) baby names. It's nothing new of course.Beat heck outa being named from whatever the baby first saw at birth, like the native Americans did.
I mean Gary Jr seems more palatable than, say, Ugly Doctor or Bed Pan
"To each, his own"
My husband didn't want our son to be a Jr...but it is his middle name.
Fits perfectly!![]()
or like George Foreman.. he didn't wait for the name to go through generations, he named all five of his sons "George"- numbered, to tell them apartWell, my wife's former husband is a Jr., his son (my unofficial step-son) is a III, and his son is a IV. We are hoping to live long enough to see James number 5.
I read someplace Michael Jackson did that, but they later became known by different names.This is a little off the subject, but I'm trying to remember the musician who gave all his kids the same name. Does anybody remember?
You're right. I remember the Frank Zappa kids — Dweezil and Moon Unit.I have no problem with naming a son after a father. It's better than giving him some horrible moniker like Dweezil to carry around the rest of his life.