David777
Well-known Member
- Location
- Silicon Valley
It seems yahoo is now banning any Comments regardless of how well presented they deem woke critical. In the past, they might not publish a comment if it used a term they flagged. Thus I would repost using slightly different terms. Now, once a user is banned, it does not matter whatever is posted against an article. Of course, much worse for those with manipulative agendas than name calling are intelligently presented critical inputs from others. And those like this person are possibly on a hair trigger non-publish list because what I carefully craft is often effective common sense.
On a current Yahoo linked usatoday.com news story about "code-switching" , my below comment was unfairly flagged.
What is code-switching? Why Black Americans say they can't be themselves at work
Many people have wisely always conformed to status quos in ways they might not have been away from work places. The article makes it sound like not being yourself is some kind of recent issue.
During the Viet Nam War after my HD, I was Counterculture oriented but at workplaces always dressed conservatively and behaved like a professional during the rest of my long successful Silicon Valley tech career. I didn't openly discuss many parts of my private life. And so did most of those in ethnic groups identified in the article. That is common sense.
It is true, there were always a few employees, usually twentysomethings, that came to workplaces just as they did at home. Long hair, sandals, blue jeans, hip clothes, etc. There are reasons why one rarely saw older employees like that because they learned. Today, recent generations moving into our corporate work places apparently have little understanding of that history and have a news media agenda to deny it ever existed.
edit: replaced with correct link at 12pm
On a current Yahoo linked usatoday.com news story about "code-switching" , my below comment was unfairly flagged.
What is code-switching? Why Black Americans say they can't be themselves at work
Many people have wisely always conformed to status quos in ways they might not have been away from work places. The article makes it sound like not being yourself is some kind of recent issue.
During the Viet Nam War after my HD, I was Counterculture oriented but at workplaces always dressed conservatively and behaved like a professional during the rest of my long successful Silicon Valley tech career. I didn't openly discuss many parts of my private life. And so did most of those in ethnic groups identified in the article. That is common sense.
It is true, there were always a few employees, usually twentysomethings, that came to workplaces just as they did at home. Long hair, sandals, blue jeans, hip clothes, etc. There are reasons why one rarely saw older employees like that because they learned. Today, recent generations moving into our corporate work places apparently have little understanding of that history and have a news media agenda to deny it ever existed.
edit: replaced with correct link at 12pm
Last edited: