Your Thoughts On Prince Harry & Meghan Upcoming Interview

Keesha said:
If you took the time to actually read any of this 95% of this tabloid BS happened AFTER they were married. Next.....

Please remember here. Good news doesn’t sell. Bad news sells which is why they focused on it. Bad news is what sells. People seems to like to read and discuss bad news. They rarely if ever discuss good news.
Click to expand...
Very true. Negative news sells.

I couldn’t read those links to Stylist so no comments.
 

AnnieA said:
Hence, the Oprah interview. No fee for the interview but priceless advertising for the 'poor me' couple that just want to go on with their lives making millions as professional philanthropists off the back of who he is by birth. They can dis his family all they want, but there are plenty of people who understand without that family, these two would not be relevant on the world stage.
Click to expand...
I’m not denying that was a smart thing to do.
It was most likely a HUGE mistake on their part. My earlier post was about why she may have been depressed. Certainly that must come with the territory, and clearly she didn’t handle it well.

If she was denied any type of psychiatric help then I understand her wish to leave. She should have just left if peace & privacy is what she wanted. I don’t personally understand the need for an Oprah interview but I’ll leave it at that.

Anyway I don’t wish to invest any more time in this hate fest any more. There are far too many beautiful things in the world to invest my time in which I shall.
 
I find it hard to believe Meghan was ever told by anyone in power that she couldn't see a therapist. The person she (wrongly) approached in the palace was in the Human Resources dept which was for the servants. She was told by him that he could only make such arrangements for the paid employees. The staff for the royals, everyone from window cleaners to cooks and maids numbers the hundreds. Naturally that group of servants doesn't include the people they serve.

Diana had a regular therapist. We know Prince Phillip saw one at one time, and who knows who else, it would be confidential patient information. So I seriously doubt that Meghan would ever have been denied help if she had asked one of the other royals to arrange it for her. But I don't know why she would do that. All Meghan, herself, ever needed to do was call her regular doctor and ask for a referral. Then call for a driver, the same way she calls for a driver to take her to baby showers, pre-natal appointments or anywhere else. No need to call a Uber.

I feel sympathy for anyone with depression, but I don't understand why Meghan, a 39 year-old woman, couldn't have picked up her phone and made an appointment for herself. No one else even needed to know a thing about it.
 
Last edited:
Nosy Bee-54 said:
Really! This reminds me of the guy who just left the WH telling everyone during a debate that he was the least racist person in the room. William just added fuel to the fire.
Click to expand...
To be fair to William, being put in the position of being asked if your family is racist is no-win situation.
Don't answer and you look like you are indeed racist.
Hedge on your answer and it looks like you're protecting a particular family member.
Say you're not racist and people will think you're lying or in denial.
Say yes and your family's goose is cooked for eternity.
 
Last edited:
.
The population of the United Kingdom is 67,886,011 ….
126, 000 is not even a sparrow’s pee in the ocean.

Thank goodness there are not as many haters in the UK these days. Piers Morgan will never be reinstated.
 
Dana said:
.
The population of the United Kingdom is 67,886,011 ….
126, 000 is not even a sparrow’s pee in the ocean.

Thank goodness there are not as many haters in the UK these days. Piers Morgan will never be reinstated.
Click to expand...
yet you felt that 41,000 was good enough to get him sacked.... remember many of those voters are not even British.. many are from Australia and the USA , who are voting for freedom of speech..whether they believe he's right or wrong..and those numbers will raise exponentially.

he won't return to the morning show even if they begged him now having lost thousands of viewers almost overnight.. , but he will be offered much better positions.. watch this space...
 
I am a positive person...I stay away from negativity as much as I can because negativity has a way of becoming a festering sore. Therefore, I will no longer be adding to this hatefest. I feel it is not necessary for me to give toxic people more fodder to feed on.
 
Dana said:
.
The population of the United Kingdom is 67,886,011 ….
126, 000 is not even a sparrow’s pee in the ocean.

Thank goodness there are not as many haters in the UK these days. Piers Morgan will never be reinstated.
Click to expand...
I don't understand the charge of "hater." It doesn't seem to apply to the people who want Piers Morgan's career ruined, but the people saying anything less than complementary about Meghan are called "haters."

I believe that when public figures like the Duke and Duchess of Sussex voluntarily go on global TV to talk about their problems then they are fair game. When they go so far as to throw shade at other people who aren't there to defend themselves, then I think we have a duty to apply a little critical thinking to their charges.

Right now in America the charge of racist is as hot a button and as damaging as the charge of communism during the 1950s. Meghan threw it at the Royals and I think we really owe it to them to question whether it's true or not.

The attorneys for the Derek Chauvin trial are now selecting the jurors and one of the things they keep asking is "How do you tell if someone is telling the truth?" The jurors are expected to take into account the likelihood of what's being said. Analyze motives. Why might this person be making it up? Does it sound reasonable? If they doubt whether someone is telling the truth it wont make them haters it will mean they're trying to make a fair decision.
 
Della said:
I don't understand the charge of "hater." It doesn't seem to apply to the people who want Piers Morgan's career ruined, but the people saying anything less than complementary about Meghan are called "haters."

I believe that when public figures like the Duke and Duchess of Sussex voluntarily go on global TV to talk about their problems then they are fair game. When they go so far as to throw shade at other people who aren't there to defend themselves, then I think we have a duty to apply a little critical thinking to their charges.

Right now in America the charge of racist is as hot a button and as damaging as the charge of communism during the 1950s. Meghan threw it at the Royals and I think we really owe it to them to question whether it's true or not.

The attorneys for the Derek Chauvin trial are now selecting the jurors and one of the things they keep asking is "How do you tell if someone is telling the truth?" The jurors are expected to take into account the likelihood of what's being said. Analyze motives. Why might this person be making it up? Does it sound reasonable? If they doubt whether someone is telling the truth it wont make them haters it will mean they're trying to make a fair decision.
Click to expand...

I was watching that, I was very surprised that potential jurors are given such in depth questions to their characters, before being chosen as a possible jurist.. it doesn't happen here, but then I suppose that may come down to money and the huge sums lawyers get paid in the USA.. but certainly it's a good idea as prosecutors and defendants to measure up the characters of those who will be ultimately responsible for the life of another human being..
 
Last edited:
StarSong said:
To be fair to William, being put in the position of being asked if your family is racist is no-win situation.
Don't answer and you look like you are indeed racist.
Hedge on your answer and it looks like you're protecting a particular family member.
Say you're not racist and people will think you're lying or in denial.
Say yes and your family's goose is cooked for eternity.
Click to expand...


Critical race theory (which is all the rage in academia these days) says, basically, that all white people are racists and all institutions are racist. So if you say you're not racist, you're lying.
 
So why did Meghan want an interview with Oprah?

"I think they agreed to do it, wanted to do it, were ready to do it because when you have been lied about for a series of years—I think anybody can understand this—if in your own office or in your own family, somebody is saying things about you that are not true and how hurtful that is, or if you’re online and you read the comments from something that somebody has said about you and you continue to see those comments, how hurtful that is," Oprah said…….

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/s...arry-meghan-markle-agreed-to-oprah-interview/
 
mellowyellow said:
were ready to do it because when you have been lied about for a series of years—
Click to expand...
It wasn’t by Harry’s family. The media commotion was by the tabloids, but Harry & Meghan went after the Queen and the Royal Family.

Facts were distorted and using the term “The Firm” was calculated.

Oprah’s reactions were hilarious knowing she’s engineered everything, as the head of any powerful tv show will do. She’s not neutral considering she was a guest at the $32 million dollar wedding.

Harry & Meghan are the media replacements for Kim & Kanye.
 
Della said:
Right now in America the charge of racist is as hot a button and as damaging as the charge of communism during the 1950s. Meghan threw it at the Royals and I think we really owe it to them to question whether it's true or not.
Click to expand...
Racism has been going on in America since 1619! (402 years). It did not just raise it's ugly head.
 
Chet said:
Anyone who makes a living trashing other people is a maggot.
Click to expand...
Piers Morgan does spend time building up some peoples lives, for example championing Captain Tom on his way up and down his garden a hundred times, in the run up to his hundredth birthday, so Piers is a more nuanced character than you're giving him credit for, but please desist, I'm as ready to condemn the man as anyone for his bloated ego etc., so stop forcing me to defend him! :)
 
Meghan should have gone into therapy on her own if she really felt like she needed it. She married into the family. Trash the media who done you wrong. If you don't like the family rules and regulations then get a divorce. Harry has all the money he inherited from Diana so get your own security. Archie does not need a title unless you want to be a part of the family you are trashing.

I would not doubt for a minute that she treated her staff badly. Put those acting skills to work and make your own living. Hire your own staff to clean your house and wash your clothes. Better yet do it yourself. That way you have no reason to whine about how people treated you. Just my opinion so don't jump on me!!
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top