Your Thoughts On Prince Harry & Meghan Upcoming Interview

I bet OW paid them a ton of money for that interview and now I'm reading where Meghan is weighing her options as a future democrat candidate for U S President maybe in the next election. It just sounds to me like they were looking for something other than privacy like they claimed.
 

Oprah said, in the very beginning of the interview, that she wanted to make it clear that Meghan and Harry weren't getting any money for the interview.

The couple recently signed a deal with Netflix for a rumored $100 million to produce documentaries and children's movies over the next few years. Meghan said she compared herself to Ariel (Disney princess) during the interview so that may have been a plug for things to come.

They also just bought a house costing 14.7 million near where Oprah Winfrey and Ellen DeGeneres also have estates. I expect any interview pay would have been chump change to them.
 
Della said:
Oprah said, in the very beginning of the interview, that she wanted to make it clear that Meghan and Harry weren't getting any money for the interview.

The couple recently signed a deal with Netflix for a rumored $100 million to produce documentaries and children's movies over the next few years. Meghan said she compared herself to Ariel (Disney princess) during the interview so that may have been a plug for things to come.

They also just bought a house costing 14.7 million near where Oprah Winfrey and Ellen DeGeneres also have estates. I expect any interview pay would have been chump change to them.
Click to expand...
Regardless of how many times it repeated some will still believe what they want to believe. A quick Google can confirm that the couple was not paid for the interview. Plus some try to diminish Meghan who was an independent hardworking woman with $$$ assets before joining the monarchy. Compare that with Harry who relied on a stipend from Charles and an inheritance.
 
Harry and Meghan Finally Admit They Didn’t Have Secret Backyard Wedding

Meghan told Oprah she and Harry tied the knot “in our backyard” three days before the $50 million public wedding on May 19, 2018.

Meghan, 39, said in the interview, “You know, three days before our wedding, we got married. No one knows that. The vows that we have framed in our room are just the two of us in our backyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury.”

The claim was much disputed, not least because in the U.K. a minimum of two witnesses are needed for a legal marriage to take place.

Today’s formal admission to The Daily Beast that no marriage took place in advance of the official ceremony comes after the marriage certificate document was obtained by the British newspaper the Sun—the paper paid £42 (about $58) to obtain a copy from Britain’s General Register Office.


patient.jpg
 
digifoss said:
I bet OW paid them a ton of money for that interview and now I'm reading where Meghan is weighing her options as a future democrat candidate for U S President maybe in the next election. It just sounds to me like they were looking for something other than privacy like they claimed.
Click to expand...
First of all, Markle will have to divest herself of all royal titles including that of Duchess if she wants a career in politics in this country. Our Constitution is patently clear on that subject. Secondly, she cannot just rely on her woke friends to get her on a ballot so she'll have a long row to hoe.
 
mellowyellow said:
Harry and Meghan Finally Admit They Didn’t Have Secret Backyard Wedding

Meghan told Oprah she and Harry tied the knot “in our backyard” three days before the $50 million public wedding on May 19, 2018.

Meghan, 39, said in the interview, “You know, three days before our wedding, we got married. No one knows that. The vows that we have framed in our room are just the two of us in our backyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury.”

The claim was much disputed, not least because in the U.K. a minimum of two witnesses are needed for a legal marriage to take place.

Today’s formal admission to The Daily Beast that no marriage took place in advance of the official ceremony comes after the marriage certificate document was obtained by the British newspaper the Sun—the paper paid £42 (about $58) to obtain a copy from Britain’s General Register Office.


View attachment 156264
Click to expand...

A very odd thing to lie about, and to try to give some rational explanation for it could there be a way in which both propositions could contain an element of truth? Surely, as some other forum member has stated, Prince Harry would know one way or the other, and even not picking Meghan up publicly, if its nonsense, he'd surely have to suspect Meghan's mental health, if she truly made up the story completely.
 
.🦆🦆
Here we go again…another aberration of the truth. Harry and Meghan did have a “private exchange of vows” in their backyard performed by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

The term “wedding” can mean a blessing. Run with the tabloids and you run with hell.
.
🦆🦆
 
Last edited:
grahamg said:
Piers Morgan does spend time building up some peoples lives, for example championing Captain Tom on his way up and down his garden a hundred times, in the run up to his hundredth birthday, so Piers is a more nuanced character than you're giving him credit for, but please desist, I'm as ready to condemn the man as anyone for his bloated ego etc., so stop forcing me to defend him! :)
Click to expand...
It isn't so much what he says but the fact that he says it! To be honest, we need more people like him, who are not afraid to speak their minds. There is too much pussy-footing, and fear of offending.
On the question of Meghan...it has now come to light that she lied/was mistaken about the wedding; what else has she misled us on?
What a contrast to Zara Tindall and her husband, always smiling and happy together, and now with their new baby son. Not all the royals are self-pitying whingers.
 
Warrigal said:
Princess Anne, a royal princess meaning that she was a princess from birth, has a son and a daughter, neither of whom have a title. They are Peter Mark Andrew Phillips and Zara Anne Elizabeth (Phillips) Tindall. On the other hand, Prince Andrew's daughters are both referred to as Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice. It is up to the monarch to bestow titles.
Click to expand...
Princess Anne didn't want her children to have titles. She wanted them to be able to live as normal a life as possible.
 
I am looking forward to 60 minutes special on Sunday night.
Especially since they were caught out in a lie over their whole marriage three days before the real one.
It should be fascinating. No, no wait, I'm sorry the poor little mermaid got confused. 🙄
 
Ruthanne said:
My thoughts on the interview is that I didn't watch it and really have no interest in watching it.
Click to expand...
I didn't watch it either. I lost interest in this insipid pair some time ago...that incident with the banana did it for me.
How long before Harry comes creeping back, tail between his legs, whinging about how he was deceived, and can he please have all his privileges back?
 
Ummm..... I am not sure I even want to resond to anything they say or do. So why am I writing this? I'm not. It's a figment of your imagination.
 
.I don't really follow the "Royals". I can never remember which brother is which. I understand the celebrity aspect of Royalty. I'm amazed at how some seem to regard royals as a superhuman species. I think some forget they are flesh and blood people, with very human foibles, and assets.
 
fuzzybuddy said:
.I don't really follow the "Royals". I can never remember which brother is which. I understand the celebrity aspect of Royalty. I'm amazed at how some seem to regard royals as a superhuman species. I think some forget they are flesh and blood people, with very human foibles, and assets.
Click to expand...
Perhaps Americans are not aware of the obligations that royalty have. They are paid an allowance from the public purse, in return they are expected to perform public duties, such as opening fetes etc. They also give their support to various charities. This is why Prince Harry has lost a lot of his privileges...he no longer is entitled to receive anything. I think he expected to keep his lifestyle without the obligations that go with it.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top