Origins: The notion that "Christendom" (primarily western Europe, but also North America) is in danger of being overwhelmed within a few generations by Muslim immigrants with comparatively high birth rates (while the natives of the countries they are emigrating to are reproducing at or below mere replacement level) has been a common topic of western press articles in the last several years. However, such articles (and examples like the video linked above) often suffer from flaws that tip them more towards being alarmist rather than accurate and sober analyses: They cherry pick and exaggerate a few gloomy-sounding statistics without presenting them within a larger context, they assume that current demographic trends will remain static even in the face of future political, economic or social changes, and they don't acknowledge that fertility rates are influenced by a number of complex, interrelated, and volatile factors.
For starters, much of the information presented in the video is incorrect, unsubstantiated, or misrepresented:
re:On a similar note, I assume you're an avid gun rights supporter.
AWWW jeez..JIM,lets stick with the topic and save that gun rights for another gun topic,otherwise we'll be here all day once that group gets whiff of the word "guns."
look up the phrase "honor killing" then get back to me.
Heard all about it.
More exaggeration as to the prevalence of it.
Wasnt it some kid,David?, that threw a rock at some hulk.?
I can not believe that somebody can write Muslims are animals.
prove it
To help my own understanding I like to check footnotes and crunch numbers. You've all heard it right? It's all over the blogosphere. It's in all the Rifqa Bary articles. Atlas Shrugs knows it. Jihad Watch knows it. The United Nations Population Fund estimates that 5,000 Muslim women are victims of honor killings annually. Wow! That's a major problem.
Let's start with the footnote.
UNFPA: Chapter 3: Ending Violence against Women and Girls"Throughout the world, perhaps as many as 5,000 women and girls a year are murdered by members of their own families..."
It's not 5,000 Muslim honor killings. It's 5,000 women and girls murdered by members of their own family. Huge difference! Women murdered in America would be included as part of that statistic. The report does say many (not most) of them are honor killings, and the majority of honor killings are in Muslim majority countries, but it makes no estimate as to how many that is. I'm not trying to diminish the issue, just refine the statistics. Honor killings are a major problem.
Now, let's give it some perspective.
Let's accept the 5,000 number as our first sample, flawed as it is. We'll presume all 5,000 women and girls murdered by members of their own families are Muslim, even though we know that's not true, and put motive aside for the moment. A recent report from the The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life found that there are an estimated 1.57 billion Muslims in the world, which is approaching 25% of the world population. We'll use that as our second sample. That's 3.2 per Million Muslim women murdered by their family annually.
Now, lets look at America.
According the FBI Expanded Homicide Data There were 14,180 US murders in 2008. Of those, 930 were women and girls murdered by their own families. We'll use that as our first sample. According to The Bartleby World Factbook for 2008 the United States had approximately 301 million people the year these statistics were gathered. So, let's accept that as our second sample. That's 3.1 per Million American women murdered by their family annually.
![]()
So the difference between the rate at which Muslims murder women in their family and Americans murder women in their family is 1 per 10 Million. That's a statistically insignificant difference, especially considering we know the 5,000 sample would actually include the 930 American murders.
There's a lot of truth in many of the opinions that have been expressed in this thread, also a lot of misunderstanding.
Referring to the Israelis and Palestinians as "idiotic countries" shows the ignorance of the writer. The Palestinians are not a country, really; they are the non-Jewish (mostly Muslim) residents of Israel. (A mostly meaningless "State of Palestine" has been created, but it is an idea more than a land.) Most of them are as peace-loving as anyone else. The violence is coming from Hamas, a terrorist group. Calling Hamas a "country" would be like referring to the Mafia as a country. They want violence and killing, that's apparently all they know how to do. They will sacrifice any number of their own people to express their hate of Israel. And yes, this stuff goes back for centuries.
The Israelis are a civilized, modern nation, mostly secular, who are trying to live in the midst of escalating hatred and violence against them. Netanyahu and his followers are pretty right wing, and no doubt have inflamed some of the hatred against Israel, although from what I've seen over the years, Hamas and their ilk don't need much of an excuse. Like many American liberals, I think those settlements are a bad idea. But an Israeli friend of mine points out that Israel made a mistake turning Gaza over, as Hamas is using that place to build tunnels and military installations from which to lob rockets into civilian centers of Israel.
I don't even know what they are fighting over. Israel is a tiny country, about the size of NJ. And it's probably the only place in the middle east that has no oil! I think the fighting is motivated by religious fanaticism, pure and simple.
Making concessions doesn't seem to get any peace for Israel; it just encourages the terrorists, who apparently perceive it as a sign of weakness. Sadly, I don't think there is any solution to this problem, short of WW3.
There's a lot of truth in many of the opinions that have been expressed in this thread, also a lot of misunderstanding.
Referring to the Israelis and Palestinians as "idiotic countries" shows the ignorance of the writer. The Palestinians are not a country, really; they are the non-Jewish (mostly Muslim) residents of Israel. (A mostly meaningless "State of Palestine" has been created, but it is an idea more than a land.) Most of them are as peace-loving as anyone else. The violence is coming from Hamas, a terrorist group. Calling Hamas a "country" would be like referring to the Mafia as a country. They want violence and killing, that's apparently all they know how to do. They will sacrifice any number of their own people to express their hate of Israel. And yes, this stuff goes back for centuries.
The Israelis are a civilized, modern nation, mostly secular, who are trying to live in the midst of escalating hatred and violence against them. Netanyahu and his followers are pretty right wing, and no doubt have inflamed some of the hatred against Israel, although from what I've seen over the years, Hamas and their ilk don't need much of an excuse. Like many American liberals, I think those settlements are a bad idea. But an Israeli friend of mine points out that Israel made a mistake turning Gaza over, as Hamas is using that place to build tunnels and military installations from which to lob rockets into civilian centers of Israel.
I don't even know what they are fighting over. Israel is a tiny country, about the size of NJ. And it's probably the only place in the middle east that has no oil! I think the fighting is motivated by religious fanaticism, pure and simple.
Making concessions doesn't seem to get any peace for Israel; it just encourages the terrorists, who apparently perceive it as a sign of weakness. Sadly, I don't think there is any solution to this problem, short of WW3.
majority of Muslims hate the Jews because the holocaust gets more worldwide attention than they. pure jealousy. add to it in WW2 Hitler enlisted muslims to hunt down the jews
Indian prostitutes. Many women and girls are lured into prostitution by traffickers who target the poor and vulnerable.
that's a horrible copy and paste. add to it your links don't work. 404 errors, page cannot be displayand. it has NOTHING to do with muslim honor killings what so ever. wanna try again ???
say what huh???
Prove it.
Horse crap. Try reading it again. The article accurately & factually addressed the issue. You can feel free to accept it or not, makes no difference to me.
I don't know why the link doesn't work, but if you do a Google search of the following - lies damn lies & statistics sf examiner article - the article I posted will be the first result.
I don't know where you got that bit about prostitution, but it wasn't in anything I posted.
I don't even know what they are fighting over.
no problem
BTY MR Mufti here was the uncle of Yarsser arafat. another jew killer
yes it was. your post 37. Ending Violence against Women and Girls
OK fine, so I didn't check out every link in the article.
But as far as the statement you quoted from it about Indian prostitutes, are you saying it's not true?
Or do you have some other issue with it?
it was in your link. you tell me
Given all the news reports I've seen about forced prostitution in various countries around the world, I have no reason to doubt it.
But since that particular subject has nothing to do with what we were talking about, there is no reason to discuss it here.
Trying to change the subject, are ye?