How much does a book title influence you when you are considering buying it?

A number of female writers wrote using 'male nom de plumes' in order to 'get into' a male dominated world of writing eg George Elliot

J K Rowling uses Robert Gailbraith for her crime mysteries. Not sure how that fits in with the above but perhaps she wanted to move away from her 'Harry Potter' novels!!

Just wanted to add to @JimBob1952 #48
 

Phoenix
The title is an attempt to get you to pull the book out of the shelf-that is it's primary function, especially with authors your not
familiar with.

Jim Bob:
'give me paws' cute
 
Phoenix
The title is an attempt to get you to pull the book out of the shelf-that is it's primary function, especially with authors your not
familiar with.

Jim Bob:
'give me paws' cute
Yes, I know. I've been writing since 1981. I just wanted input from people here.
 

A number of female writers wrote using 'male nom de plumes' in order to 'get into' a male dominated world of writing eg George Elliot

J K Rowling uses Robert Gailbraith for her crime mysteries. Not sure how that fits in with the above but perhaps she wanted to move away from her 'Harry Potter' novels!!

Just wanted to add to @JimBob1952 #48
Or it's because of sexism. She used her initials for that reason.
 
Mine fit in multiple genres. But they are not general fiction either. A lot of the experience represented here is relative to books in hard copy. Mine are digital. While you can download the first 10 -15 percent of the book for free to see if it is to your liking before you decide to buy, it is not the same as picking it up in the bookstore and paging through it. They will stay digital for economic reasons on my part. If that means no one buys them, so be it.
I read a lot of the free samples on Google...and I have actually gone on to buy some of the books. However I prefer a 'proper' book and always buy the hard copy. I love being surrounded by books, and as many of mine are non-fiction, they are often used for reference.
 
A number of female writers wrote using 'male nom de plumes' in order to 'get into' a male dominated world of writing eg George Elliot

J K Rowling uses Robert Gailbraith for her crime mysteries. Not sure how that fits in with the above but perhaps she wanted to move away from her 'Harry Potter' novels!!

Just wanted to add to @JimBob1952 #48

Forgot about Middlemarch, certainly one of the greatest novels ever written. But my all time favorite among women writers is Edith Wharton.
 
I read a lot of the free samples on Google...and I have actually gone on to buy some of the books. However I prefer a 'proper' book and always buy the hard copy. I love being surrounded by books, and as many of mine are non-fiction, they are often used for reference.
Any book is a "proper" book. I understand wanting to hold something in one's hands. But the author goes to the same amount of work for an ebook as for a hard copy.
Forgot about Middlemarch, certainly one of the greatest novels ever written. But my all time favorite among women writers is Edith Wharton.
I don't know that book or author. I write the kind of stuff I'd like to read.
 
Getting back to the importance of titles. About 15 years ago I was on a crowded commuter train and a woman standing next to me was reading a book. Having grown up in NY, I'm well aware of train etiquette. Only noobs and tourists engage strangers in conversation - or even make eye contact - unless the train stops unexpectedly for 30 seconds or longer, a fellow rider has an adorable baby or toddler in tow, or a particularly offensive passenger just made his/her way through the car.

Nevertheless, this book's title was so compelling that I couldn't help but break an ironclad social contract. I tapped her on the shoulder, apologized for the intrusion, and said that I was intrigued by the title. Was the book any good?

She replied that she'd seen the title while idly browsing a book store table, was likewise very curious, took the plunge, and was happy to report that it was quite good. End of interaction. Armageddon wasn't triggered by my breach of social conventions.

I bought the book shortly thereafter, enjoyed it immensely and recommended it to several friends who also liked it.

On an aside, not long after I read it, my husband was talking to a fabric supplier who happens to be Iranian. Something came up about Middle Eastern politics and my husband made an insightful remark that surprised Joseph. He asked, "How do you know that?"
My husband replied that I'd talked to him about that part of Iranian life while reading Lipstick Jihad.

Hubby said that Joseph's eyebrows shot up and he said slowly, "Your wife read Lipstick Jihad? That's impressive." It had been recently published and while popular among Iranian emigres, it was far less so among mainstream Americans.

Truth is, Lipstick Jihad: A Memoir of Growing up Iranian in America and American in Iran, would probably never would have blipped on my radar screen if not for the prominent Lipstick Jihad portion of the title and the lady on the train.
 
Getting back to the importance of titles. About 15 years ago I was on a crowded commuter train and a woman standing next to me was reading a book. Having grown up in NY, I'm well aware of train etiquette. Only noobs and tourists engage strangers in conversation - or even make eye contact - unless the train stops unexpectedly for 30 seconds or longer, a fellow rider has an adorable baby or toddler in tow, or a particularly offensive passenger just made his/her way through the car.

Nevertheless, this book's title was so compelling that I couldn't help but break an ironclad social contract. I tapped her on the shoulder, apologized for the intrusion, and said that I was intrigued by the title. Was the book any good?

She replied that she'd seen the title while idly browsing a book store table, was likewise very curious, took the plunge, and was happy to report that it was quite good. End of interaction. Armageddon wasn't triggered by my breach of social conventions.

I bought the book shortly thereafter, enjoyed it immensely and recommended it to several friends who also liked it.

On an aside, not long after I read it, my husband was talking to a fabric supplier who happens to be Iranian. Something came up about Middle Eastern politics and my husband made an insightful remark that surprised Joseph. He asked, "How do you know that?"
My husband replied that I'd talked to him about that part of Iranian life while reading Lipstick Jihad.

Hubby said that Joseph's eyebrows shot up and he said slowly, "Your wife read Lipstick Jihad? That's impressive." It had been recently published and while popular among Iranian emigres, it was far less so among mainstream Americans.

Truth is, Lipstick Jihad: A Memoir of Growing up Iranian in America and American in Iran, would probably never would have blipped on my radar screen if not for the prominent Lipstick Jihad portion of the title and the lady on the train.
Nonfiction is a whole different beast in terms of the ability to sell it. If it's creative nonfiction which tells a story people are much more likely to buy it than fiction. Nonfiction in general sells better. That is an interesting title.
 
Any book is a "proper" book. I understand wanting to hold something in one's hands. But the author goes to the same amount of work for an ebook as for a hard copy.

I don't know that book or author. I write the kind of stuff I'd like to read.
Middlemarch, by George Eliot, is the kind of stuff I like to read. So is The House of Mirth by Edith Wharton.
 
How a book is written is very important. The author's standard of education is very evident in his/her writing. There have been several times when I have been drawn to a book but have quickly discarded it, because poor English really puts me off.
Interestingly, the last two books I have bought have been written by people from the Middle East, and their language skills are actually better than many American/British writers.
 
Forgot about Middlemarch, certainly one of the greatest novels ever written. But my all time favorite among women writers is Edith Wharton.
Although familiar with her name, I don't believe I've ever read any of Ms. Wharton's works. I'll have to check out The House of Mirth. Thanks for the recommendation. Ditto Eliot's Middlemarch.
 
Wharton's Ethan Frome is an unexpected, delicious read.
I decided to look this up online. They wouldn't allow me to see the first few pages. So I looked elsewhere to see what it is about. When I read about it, I decided it was not for me. I've had so many tragedies in my life, I don't need to read someone's dark view of life in the fiction they write.
 
I decided to look this up online. They wouldn't allow me to see the first few pages. So I looked elsewhere to see what it is about. When I read about it, I decided it was not for me. I've had so many tragedies in my life, I don't need to read someone's dark view of life in the fiction they write.
Amazon. As often happens when books are reprinted, there are a few versions. Click on the one that shows a snowy background, and you can get the "see inside" option.
 
If the title has some romance in it I'll def pick it up and read the back...but let's say it has something to do w/vampire romance I'm out. Not in to vampires.
I pretty much know what kind of books I like......but ya , if the story on the back doesn't grab me, I'll keep looking.
 
It may draw attention from me, as a book to look at. When looking I browse my favorite genre and authors first. THEN if a title jumps out at me I will give it a closer look. I am more interested in what the story is.
Sometimes the title, alone can be deceiving. Think "To Kill a Mockingbird" or, my favorite book "A Tree Grows in Brooklyn" neither title would have convinced me to buy the books, but they are good books.
 
Amazon. As often happens when books are reprinted, there are a few versions. Click on the one that shows a snowy background, and you can get the "see inside" option.
Okay, I did that. Thanks. Trouble is, it only gave me one page even though it said I would get more if I signed in, so I signed in. I still got only one long page. The writing on that first page did not impress me. The style is poor. It made me realize I've learned a lot about writing and made me feel better about my own, since this is seen as a good book and a classic. Thanks. That is reassuring. I also know that when she was writing, accepted styles were different from what they are now. I remember in lit class in college the professor talked about that...the way writing styles had changed since the early days. I had written one of my papers in the old style. That's when he talked about it.
 
I don't know which weird characters first appeared, in print or TV entry came first?
As adults, vampires, zombies, books should not be of interest to us, but their cranking them out,
Wonder how books on Big Foot are selling (giggle).
I have a friend who writes those kinds of books to get the demons out of his head, post Vietnam. He has severe PTSD. He said writing those stories is far better therapy for him than all the drugs they used to give him. He refused to take them after a time.

I "had" a friend who stopped being my friend because I did not believe in Big Foot. She knew she had seen one. I said what did he look like? She said, "A hairy Mexican."
 
Although familiar with her name, I don't believe I've ever read any of Ms. Wharton's works. I'll have to check out The House of Mirth. Thanks for the recommendation. Ditto Eliot's Middlemarch.


She also wrote The Age of Innocence, turned into a pretty good film by Martin Scorcese. Also an excellent writer of short stories. And don't forget Jerry Old's recommendation on Ethan Frome, which you can read in a couple of hours.
 
I generally don't buy books, I usually check them out from the library in electronic format if possible.

When I do get a physical book from the library the title sometimes catches me, other times it's the art on the spine or the art on the cover that will catch my attention. What I do next is to read the first page of book and if it catches me I check it out from the library. For electronic books I'll check it out if it sounds interesting and then read the first page and check it back in if it doesn't interest me.
Ditto
I "had" a friend who stopped being my friend because I did not believe in Big Foot. She knew she had seen one. I said what did he look like? She said, "A hairy Mexican."
Hahaha. I’m sorry but this is funny.
Maybe it was a friend better off lost.
It was her loss.
 
Interesting question, as one who had read countless books and author of one published.
So many famous and notable authors choose very bad titles, such as Boredom (A. Moravia) or Nausea (Sartre)
Same is true in arts, business, etc.
You want a name that briefly encapsulates the novel in a few words and attracts the kind of readers who are your audience. Short titles are best for novels, kids books. My novel title is a play on words with 2 meanings. The title is the first thing people notice, then the cover art. Try to be fresh, original, play with some keywords in combinations.
So study the titles on Amazon or another site. Titles are not copyright. You could choose a "buzzword" also, words that are supposed to appeal to everyone: love, free, joy, mother, liberty, hero etc. "Heart" as a metaphor is very very overused. So is family. The words should be understood by everyone regardless of their education.
 
Last edited:
Read 'The Kite Runner,' because the title and flyleaf attracted me. The story is about Afghan Culture and rather gritty.
However, he also discusses the attraction of knit flying and the prestige it has in that tortured land.
So, yes, I only picked up the book due to the title.
 
I look for books by interest area online and don't go by titles. They mattered more in the days of shelf browsing.
 


Back
Top